Originally posted by: bo3bber
:disgust:
The question has been, is it the Board or the RAM? I think I have a pretty solid answer:
neither. Allow me to explain.
I wanted to see if anyone was having luck with the A8V, so I did some highly targeted google searches to see if anyone has much success. The answer is yes:
http://www.abxzone.com/forums/showthrea...370&page=7&pp=15&highlight=a8v+corsair
That's a mighty big thread, but there are multiple people there who have success getting their RAM up to 245Mhz or so. It's also worth noting that KheeWhee has a solid configuration at 247Mhz.
So, that's an existence proof that the board can overclock the RAM, and run solidly. So, it's
not the board.
Secondly, I wanted to see if my RAM in particular wasn't good enough to reach these numbers.
My Corsair XMS4000 contains Hynix BT-43 RAM chips, which successfully overclock to 530Mhz on other boards. These are the same chips used in some very successful Geil and OCZ RAM sticks, so this is not sleazy RAM.
See Anand's review at:
http://www.anandtech.com/memory/showdoc.aspx?i=1849&p=8
For Lauy's question about Ballistix RAM specifically, Ballistix is also high quality RAM, there is no question it will run at the rated speed on other boards. Ballistix PC4000 contain Micron 46V32M8 -5B G chips.
See Anand's review at:
http://anandtech.com/memory/showdoc.aspx?i=2145&p=18
That review compares quite a number of RAM, including Ballistix 3200, which reportedly use the same Micron chips as the 4000. Also of note on that graph is that my Corsair XMS went to 530Mhz at the max. Crucial 3200 went to 514Mhz.
The RAM we are all using is unimpeachable. So, it's
not the RAM.
Hence, my conclusion of neither. With a lean toward the board being at 'fault' because most of us are overclocking the board, its spec is only DDR400.
When reading that first thread, it's clear that there are specific RAM/Board combinations that are more successful than ours. For example, the OCZ PC3200 that KheeWhee uses is successful more often than not. The Ballistix 4000 version is not successful very often. Same with my Corsair XMS.
Here is a thread talking specifically about which RAM chips work best for A8V:
http://www.ocforums.com/showthread.php?t=332591
Thus, the limiting factor is really that some RAM just have minor incompatabilities with the board, and thus cannot overclock well. They will run fine at the rated speed of the board, but have no headroom. This is the fundamental premise of overclocking of course, no guarantees, just lots of guesses.
So, to get those higher numbers, you either have to change RAM, or change your board.
One last possiblity is that we aren't doing it right. It's clear that the Auto settings aren't particularly smart when it comes to the RAM. Slug has demonstrated that he can get to 240 with Ballistix, by tweaking the Read Preamble and AsyncLat settings. This didn't work for XMS RAM though. Slug, how confident are you in your current settings?
I cannot get more than 10% out of the board, with my RAM (220 Mhz maxes out). But, my CPU goes to 2400 from 2000, which is my main concern. Still, KheeWhee and others can get about 25% more out of the board, by using the OCZ RAM. From this board's perspective, that RAM
is superior.
From my perspective, the added headroom isn't enough to justify the conversion just yet. I'm probably going to move to a PCI express SLI board anyway, and will try to use my XMS Ram there. But, I may just get a new AGP video card when the prices drop instead.
The ASUS is a good choice from the perspective of being reliable and well supported. But, I'd say it's clearly not the preferred overclockers board, regardless of the reviews. If you have exactly the right RAM, it's fine, but that wasn't at all clear when I bought the board... To be blunt, we chose poorly.
There is a chance that a BIOS update will fix the problems, because it's possible that the OCZ work well simply because they match the BIOS settings better. I'm not holding my breath.
If you want to swap RAM, the ones that seemed to work best were the OCZ 3700EB, and OCZ Platinum 3200 Rev 2. There was a lot of propaganda regarding other RAM, these were two that stood out as working for people who clearly cared about 100% stability.
I will play with the RAM settings a bit more, but can't really justify much more time for a 10% improvement. Now that my RAM/overclocking education is almost complete....
Please let me know if you think my conclusions are wrong. And hey, hope this helps.
Thanks,
bo3bber