the difference between limp-bizkit and radiohead are huge, there is no comparison in my book. LB and Fred "the fatass" Durst are just in it for the money... I like to refer to bands like LB as "no-talent assclowns." They don't care about making ground breaking music, they just want somethin' that kids with no since of self can go "rollin'" to. On the other hand you have musical geniuses in radiohead, who are constantly going against the grain of music and creating beautiful rythmes like those in OK Computer and Kid A. Radiohead are a talented group of individuals who like making the statement that you can be yourself, and create music that goes against the norm and still be successful. They have been doing this for nearly ten years now, and will be at it a lot longer if they want to.
If you ask anyone who has any say in the music industry, critics and artists alike you will find a lot more radiohead fans then you will limp-bizkit fans. but on the other end of the spectrum if you ask the troubled youth of america it will be the other way around... The bottom line is, money hungry bands may make money, but not for long.
BTW, LB was also voted worst live act, worst artist, and worst album in the january issue of Alternative Press by it's readers. You can find it at your news stands or go to alternativepress.com for more details.