Heavyweights Tyson Fury vs. Wladimir Klitschko Rematch - July 9

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,737
31,099
146
this one is non-PPV too, right?

I wouldn't count Fury out too easily; he is a traveler after all, so I don't think he's going to be easy to put down. But that first fight did have a Lewis/Rachman sort of feel to it--the stunning upset and the near-inevitable balancing of the rematch.
 

Miramonti

Lifer
Aug 26, 2000
28,653
100
106
this one is non-PPV too, right?

I wouldn't count Fury out too easily; he is a traveler after all, so I don't think he's going to be easy to put down. But that first fight did have a Lewis/Rachman sort of feel to it--the stunning upset and the near-inevitable balancing of the rematch.

HBO, so I'm assuming thats PPV.

[/edit: confusion removed]
 
Last edited:

thesmokingman

Platinum Member
May 6, 2010
2,302
231
106
Fury is done. That is all.

He won the first fight but is not a great boxer, and this time Klitschko won't be taking him for granted. I'm betting (figuratively) Klit will move much better this time and out-box him ftw.

http://espn.go.com/boxing/story/_/i...-wladimir-klitschko-manchester-england-july-9

HBO, so I'm assuming thats PPV. I think if Klitschko doesn't get it done, he should retire. He's 40 and whatever faculties are left, he should try to maintain. It's going to take a lot of active footwork to beat Fury imo, and if he doesn't have it in the legs anymore, it's time to go.



How do you go from one post where Fury is done and in the next post, it's gonna be hard for Klit, he's old and should retire? Wishy washy much?
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,737
31,099
146
HBO, so I'm assuming thats PPV. I think if Klitschko doesn't get it done, he should retire. He's 40 and whatever faculties are left, he should try to maintain. It's going to take a lot of active footwork to beat Fury imo, and if he doesn't have it in the legs anymore, it's time to go.

HBO has weekly/monthly Saturday night fights that aren't PPV, and many of them big fights, too. I think the first Fury/Klitschko fight wasn't PPV. (but that was a bit of a coup not being PPV, I think)
 

thesmokingman

Platinum Member
May 6, 2010
2,302
231
106
After the IV scam that was IVayweatether vs one armed Pac (denied pain shot) but IVayweather was allowed an IV... TUE.

I am never paying for another PPV again.
 

Miramonti

Lifer
Aug 26, 2000
28,653
100
106
Fury is done, that is all. Then ya make excuses for Klit, gotcha.

The first one is my prediction, the second one is simply my opinion if I'm wrong and it doesn't go well.

Should I only comment what he should do if he wins, since that's my prediction? Ok, if he wins, he should fvck Hayden in the middle of the ring.

wladimir-klitschko-hayden-panettiere-2.jpg
 
Last edited:

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,737
31,099
146
nope, your posts have very different messages in them

your fault, not his

fwiw, I thought the same reading that 2nd post for the first time but I understand that he was just explaining the situation/aftermath if Klitscko loses. I didn't see the 2nd post as an endorsement for Fury winning or having more of a chance than he suggested in the first post.

It reads that way, sure...maybe could use editing, but whatever. Anyway, it's obviously confusing to anyone on a first read. :D