Heat pumps (air source)

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Dec 10, 2005
29,079
14,434
136
I think it also depends on your heat pump. TechnologyConnections has a pretty good video set about these:
At around 8 minutes, he shows the table for a Mitsubishi heat pump that has a COP of 2.8 at 5 F. Granted, this is probably one of the newer, more expensive variants, but there are many more than can still have COP >2-3 at 20 F.

As for "sucking heat out of your house" - if the system is setup properly, it should just be turning off the indoor blower momentarily to run the heat/cool loop in reverse to defrost, so you shouldn't be experiencing any issues with indoor comfort.

Power draw is definitely going to be better than either traditional electric heating or traditional air conditioners. The biggest draw is that it's a lot more environmentally friendly than burning gas (or other fossil fuels) for heat.
 

pmv

Lifer
May 30, 2008
15,142
10,041
136
So are there any downsides to the mass adoption of heat pumps? I don't know much about it, but I would assume they use similar technology to a fridge or an AC unit? Which would imply they have the same issues that fridges do with respect to the escape of CFCs?
 

NutBucket

Lifer
Aug 30, 2000
27,155
635
126
I'd say not really. They've been used for decades. I mean it's literally an AC running in reverse so not really anything crazy.
 

cytg111

Lifer
Mar 17, 2008
26,376
15,755
136
Prices are high right now, so was gonna wait, but the way things are shaping I dont think they’re coming down anytime soon… will have to look into getting one this summer
 
Dec 10, 2005
29,079
14,434
136
So are there any downsides to the mass adoption of heat pumps? I don't know much about it, but I would assume they use similar technology to a fridge or an AC unit? Which would imply they have the same issues that fridges do with respect to the escape of CFCs?
CFCs are not used as refrigerants anymore, and newer refrigerants that are used don't have as many problems if they do escape.

You also can't look at mass adoption of heat pumps in isolation. You have to consider what they are replacing: a myriad of inefficient fossil fuel heating sources installed in people's homes that are often fed by aging infrastructure that results in constant gas leaks, and the whole environmental impact of extracting those fossil fuels in the first place.
 
  • Like
Reactions: dank69 and Zorba

Zorba

Lifer
Oct 22, 1999
15,613
11,256
136
So are there any downsides to the mass adoption of heat pumps? I don't know much about it, but I would assume they use similar technology to a fridge or an AC unit? Which would imply they have the same issues that fridges do with respect to the escape of CFCs?
Modern ACs typically use propane as a refrigerant, I believe new CFC AC are banned worldwide.
 

Zorba

Lifer
Oct 22, 1999
15,613
11,256
136
CFCs are not used as refrigerants anymore, and newer refrigerants that are used don't have as many problems if they do escape.

You also can't look at mass adoption of heat pumps in isolation. You have to consider what they are replacing: a myriad of inefficient fossil fuel heating sources installed in people's homes that are often fed by aging infrastructure that results in constant gas leaks, and the whole environmental impact of extracting those fossil fuels in the first place.
Even if they are replacing existing electric heat, it's resistant heating. And a heat pump will likely be 3x as efficient.

The heat pumps are the cure all though. There is also massive savings available through insulation and windows in older homes.
 
Dec 10, 2005
29,079
14,434
136
Even if they are replacing existing electric heat, it's resistant heating. And a heat pump will likely be 3x as efficient.
That is a good point that I did not include.

The heat pumps are the cure all though. There is also massive savings available through insulation and windows in older homes.
It would also have helped a ton if we kept building new housing to replace older housing stock. So many homes in my metro area are these surviving 100+ year old tinder box triple deckers just waiting for stray embers to burn them to the ground. Crap insulation, crap windows, crap heating. If we had kept building, we'd have so many more homes that have even semi-modern building standards that also include fantastic amenities like insulation and non-drafty windows. Either way, heat pumps are still a net good for old and new homes.
 

Dulanic

Diamond Member
Oct 27, 2000
9,969
592
136
I've been tempted to look into a heat pump when my AC dies. Especially since in TX it would be much more efficient. Works be nice to have something that can hear and cool. I'm just not sure if they can cool as effectively as a AC unit even though I know it would be more efficient for heating.
 
Dec 10, 2005
29,079
14,434
136
I've been tempted to look into a heat pump when my AC dies. Especially since in TX it would be much more efficient. Works be nice to have something that can hear and cool. I'm just not sure if they can cool as effectively as a AC unit even though I know it would be more efficient for heating.
A heat pump is basically a central AC system that has a valve that lets it run in reverse to heat a space instead of cool. I don't see why it couldn't be as efficient as a typical central AC system.
 
  • Like
Reactions: K1052 and Zorba

Zorba

Lifer
Oct 22, 1999
15,613
11,256
136
Not propane (typically R122) but regardless no CFCs.
I think you are thinking of either R-22 or R-134a, both of which are now banned and/or being phased out.

Propane is R-290 and Isobutane is R-600a, both are becoming more common. (Note, they aren't the same as the propane you buy at Flying-Js, much more pure and have oils added to them to lubricate the compressor.

R-410a is the other one I see on a ton of new units in the US.
 
Last edited:

Zorba

Lifer
Oct 22, 1999
15,613
11,256
136
It would also have helped a ton if we kept building new housing to replace older housing stock. So many homes in my metro area are these surviving 100+ year old tinder box triple deckers just waiting for stray embers to burn them to the ground. Crap insulation, crap windows, crap heating. If we had kept building, we'd have so many more homes that have even semi-modern building standards that also include fantastic amenities like insulation and non-drafty windows. Either way, heat pumps are still a net good for old and new homes.
I agree. That is the problem with houses being an appreciating asset, old shitty homes rarely get replaced with a well built modern home. My SIL has a 1947 house mo insulation, leaking windows, hacking central heat/air. They use 3x the utilities we do on a house half our size. Of course when they "remodeled" it, they only did cosmetic things nothing that would make it more comfortable or efficient.

When I was grad school, getting my masters with a heat transfer focus, I lived in a house built in 1903. The lack of insulation made it there where you had to have it 78 in the winter to not freeze and 65 in the summer to not sweat. Really made me understand the "Comfort" part of HVAC/building envelope design. I think the walls had less insulative value than when I lived in a cinder block apartment.
 

NutBucket

Lifer
Aug 30, 2000
27,155
635
126
I think you are thinking of either R-22 or R-134a, both of which are now banned and/or being phased out.

Propane is R-290 and Isobutane is R-600a, both are becoming more common. (Note, they aren't the same as the propane you buy at Fly-Js, much more pure and have oils added to them to lubricate the compressor.

R-410a is the other one I see on a ton of new units in the US.
You are right. I was thinking of 410.
 

snoopy7548

Diamond Member
Jan 1, 2005
8,272
5,347
146
When my central AC goes (it's approaching 10 years old, but still going strong), I'll look into replacing it with a heat pump.

I use propane for heating, but it would be nice to have a dual fuel setup so I would only need to use propane when it gets really cold. On average, I only get my 500 gallon tank filled 1.5x per year, though the price of electricity is high (MA).

I'd have to run some numbers to see if the expected cost savings is worth the extra money for a heat pump.
 

Muse

Lifer
Jul 11, 2001
41,009
10,273
136
Wood burners are cheap/efficient for btu's, but yeah there's health concerns. Wood pellets are much better (we have one, love it). More efficient, and better for the environment.
The last year or two on the seldom occasions I light a fire in my fireplace I wear an N95!
 

[DHT]Osiris

Lifer
Dec 15, 2015
17,413
16,711
146
The last year or two on the seldom occasions I light a fire in my fireplace I wear an N95!
Why? There's about a hundred things you encounter on a daily basis more likely to cause you harm than smoke particulates from a fireplace.
 

Muse

Lifer
Jul 11, 2001
41,009
10,273
136
Why? There's about a hundred things you encounter on a daily basis more likely to cause you harm than smoke particulates from a fireplace.
huh? Dunno about that. Got info from a real smart guy (Harvard grad in math) that the particulates from a fireplace are a serious health issue.

I'm even wearing an N95 on my daily 10 mile street skates. The one day I didn't in the last month (~4 days ago) felt nasty, my nose acted up in a nasty way and I decided to just keep wearing it. It's not the covid threat in the streets. It keeps air from rushing into my nostrils, which is a big help. Also, it filters out the allergens pretty completely, plus particulate matter from whatever. I don't mind the mask, and don't give a damn how I look to folks out there.
 

pmv

Lifer
May 30, 2008
15,142
10,041
136
Why? There's about a hundred things you encounter on a daily basis more likely to cause you harm than smoke particulates from a fireplace.


Not sure how to reconcile that claim with the stories in my earlier post. Those claim that the particulates from _other people's_ fireplaces are one of the most harmful things you encounter on a daily basis. Presumably your own are likely to be even worse.

 

[DHT]Osiris

Lifer
Dec 15, 2015
17,413
16,711
146
Not sure how to reconcile that claim with the stories in my earlier post. Those claim that the particulates from _other people's_ fireplaces are one of the most harmful things you encounter on a daily basis. Presumably your own are likely to be even worse.

Because in your own home, you shouldn't be experiencing much, if any of that particulate matter. It's supposed to be going up the chimney. If you're breathing in smoke inside your home you've got something janky going on and you're probably going to die from asphyxiation soon. If you're outside, yeah, there's lots of stuff out there including other people's stoves, vehicle exhaust, etc.

Long term, you'll have more issues from odd-ball shit like burning propane stovetops, alpha radiation from food prep on granite, good old fashioned food poisoning, etc.
 

NutBucket

Lifer
Aug 30, 2000
27,155
635
126
When my central AC goes (it's approaching 10 years old, but still going strong), I'll look into replacing it with a heat pump.

I use propane for heating, but it would be nice to have a dual fuel setup so I would only need to use propane when it gets really cold. On average, I only get my 500 gallon tank filled 1.5x per year, though the price of electricity is high (MA).

I'd have to run some numbers to see if the expected cost savings is worth the extra money for a heat pump.
It might make sense to install one when you need to replace your system but may not make sense to run in the winter unless propane goes up or you install solar or something.
 

K1052

Elite Member
Aug 21, 2003
53,067
47,181
136
It might make sense to install one when you need to replace your system but may not make sense to run in the winter unless propane goes up or you install solar or something.

Last I saw propane prices are up quite a bit.
 

NutBucket

Lifer
Aug 30, 2000
27,155
635
126
I'm sure but I'm aware some areas have very high electricity prices too. "It depends"
 

snoopy7548

Diamond Member
Jan 1, 2005
8,272
5,347
146
Last I saw propane prices are up quite a bit.

Yep. Up to over $5/gallon, a nearly 3x increase from what I've historically been paying.

Electric prices are about $0.3/kWh which is pretty insane as well, but my current bill is still under $100.

It's hard to stomach the thought of paying $1500 to fill my propane tank when I've always paid around $500-700, especially when the heating season is so close to being over.