Originally posted by: VinDSL
This is all magic, and nobody understands it.
		
		
	 
Not magic at all, just applied science.
Fact: A "working" heatpipe (with liquid in it) conducts heat many, many times better than just an empty copper tube (with no liquid in it). I've seen numbers quoted as high as 80x better. 
Wikipedia
Try this. Get two jars. Put a sponge into one. Pour 1cc of water into both jars. Wait a while. Now, pour out the water. OMGWTFBBQ the one with a sponge in it no longer pours out a liquid!?!?!!
Sponge = wick inside a heatpipe. 
"The basic idea of the wick is to soak up the coolant."
How heatpipes work - look at the first diagram which shows the empty space as filled with.... "Vapour" and the wick filled with.... "Liquid." If "liquid pours out" then there is one of a few possibilities:
1) The manufacturer put too much liquid inside.
2) There is no wick. This would make it a subset (or relative?) of a heatpipe called a "thermosiphon."
3) There is a wick, but it is not one of the "better" ones.
4) There is insufficient vacuum in the heatpipe.
"Better" is sintered (closer to sponge) while not as good is grooved (simple grooves in heatpipe wall, can't really hold the liquid). "In between" are wire mesh, fiber/spring and other wick designs. The "better" wick designs are better for working against gravity, as in they can be oriented whichever way. A drawback is that "better" wicks actually limits heat transfer, but in most cases it is worth the tradeoff. Note the Vapochill heatsinks which has one large heatpipe (really a thermosyphon) and which requires a certain orientation when mounted. If not mounted in the "proper" orientation for gravity to work, then it basically doesn't work at all. Most normal heatipipe heatsinks don't have this limitation because of effective wicks.
	
	
		
		
			Originally posted by: VinDSL
I can't wait to see how this all ends!
		
		
	 
It is ended.
The Phoronix article is IMO misinformed and misleading, and a good example of bad journalism.
	
	
		
		
			Originally posted by: VinDSL
Soooo, it doesn't make any sense that they would pressurize heat tubes. If anything, they would place the fluid in a vacuum...
		
		
	 
You are right. The 
Wikipedia article states:
	
	
		
		
			When making heat pipes, there is no need to create a vacuum in the pipe. One simply boils the working fluid in the heat pipe until the resulting vapour has purged the non condensing gases from the pipe and then seals the end.
An interesting property of heat pipes is the temperature over which they are effective. On first glance, it might be suspected that a water charged heat pipe would only start to work when the hot end reached 100 °C and the water boils resulting in the mass transfer which is the secret of a heat pipe. However, the boiling point of water is dependent on the pressure under which it is held. In an evacuated pipe, water will boil right down to 0 °C.
		
		
	 
This also is evidence of why liquid doesn't just pour out of a heatpipe. If it was properly designed to handle temperatures below 100ºC, then the liquid should be in a vapor state except for what is collected in the wick.
EDIT: Fixed improperly closed tags.