- Jul 11, 2001
- 37,589
- 8,134
- 136
Originally posted by: Mem
Originally posted by: Muse
Well then, it might be a dicey proposition with my Lenovo T60, which has 1.5 GB. It was supposed to be Vista capable (Aero too), when I bought it and with a charge for shipping and handling I was supposed to be able to get a "free" upgrade to Vista from XP Pro. I just called Lenovo today and was told I am SOL because the warranty has run out. Oh well. I do have a copy of Vista Ultimate that I'm not using, but I figure I should save it for a desktop install. I could install it for now on the Lenovo (upgrade, I suppose), but maybe it's not smart if 1.5 GB of RAM is really insufficient for good performance.Originally posted by: StinkyPinky
Microsoft is partially to blame for the anti-vista stance lots of n00bs have. Vista runs like crap on machines with 1gb of ram - they should have told manfacturers to stop being tight and add an extra gig. Add in the fact that most laptops in 2006 had a gig of ram, and that's a lot of negative press.
Vista is perfectly fine on 2gb+ memory.
How much is ram nowadays for 2GB stick for your laptop something like $30 at Crucial website,new operating system costs more then that,anyway its simple to figure out .
Good thinkin'! I have built all my desktops (except the first, which I bought used from a guy who built it!), but didn't think about modifying my laptop. Guess I could definitely add a 2 GB stick for a total of 3 GB. It's a nice system, could also use a bump up from the 60 GB HD. I was going to do that but someone said "why do you need a bigger HD," and I couldn't really answer that. I was getting pretty frequent message to defrag, and that was my motivation. It's actually at least 30% free space.