HDTach 3.00 Beta

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Chad

Platinum Member
Oct 11, 1999
2,224
0
76
yup, you're right. seems strange they missed something that little though. heh :p
 

Chad

Platinum Member
Oct 11, 1999
2,224
0
76
HDTach 3.00 Beta

Asus p4C800-E-Deluxe
ICH5 Controller

My Results...

Western Digital 74gig SATA150 Raptor

Short
Random Access: 7.8ms
CPU utilization: 3%
Average read: 64.9mbps
Burst: 130.5mbps

Long
Random Access: 7.8ms
CPU utilization: 2%
Average read: 65.0mbps
Burst: 130.6mbps



Western Digital 120JB Special Edition

Short
Random Access: 13.4ms
CPU utilization: 2%
Average read: 41.1mbps
Burst: 97.4mbps

Long
Random Access: 13.5ms
CPU utilization: 0%
Average read: 41.2mbps
Burst: 97.8mbps
 

Monoman

Platinum Member
Mar 4, 2001
2,163
0
76
ASUS K8V Deluxe w/ 3200+

Retial Adaptec 29160N with a 36GB 15k.3 U320

Short
Random Access: 6.4ms
CPU utilization: 1%
Average read: 66.7mbps
Burst: 126.5mbps

Long
Random Access: 6.0ms
CPU utilization: 1%
Average read: 67.8mbps
Burst: 128.6mbps
 

MichaelD

Lifer
Jan 16, 2001
31,528
3
76
Originally posted by: shuttleteam
Getting better, but still not capable of faithful results with intelligent i/o peripherals!

SCSI RAID

SATA RAID on Lsi MR SATA-6

Plain old ATA-100

Cheers!

Thank you! Glad I'm not the only one to see that. I got better results with a single Maxtor 40 GB drive than I did with my SCSI RAID-0 stripe with two 15K rpm drives! :roll:

But your SCSI raid results look pretty good, Shuttleteam. :confused: Must be that whole PCI-X thing. :(

This thing is junk.

Thank for the link, though, NFS4. :)
 

Viper96720

Diamond Member
Jul 15, 2002
4,390
0
0
Buggy beta

36GB Raptor
Long test
RA 9.1ms
CPU 11%
Avg read 49.6mbps
Burst 481mbps

Short
RA 9.1ms
CPU 4%
Avg read 49.7mbps
Burst 405mbps
 

MDE

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
13,199
1
81
Originally posted by: MichaelD
Originally posted by: shuttleteam

Getting better, but still not capable of faithful results with intelligent i/o peripherals!



SCSI RAID



SATA RAID on Lsi MR SATA-6



Plain old ATA-100



Cheers!



Thank you! Glad I'm not the only one to see that. I got better results with a single Maxtor 40 GB drive than I did with my SCSI RAID-0 stripe with two 15K rpm drives! :roll:

But your SCSI raid results look pretty good, Shuttleteam. :confused: Must be that whole PCI-X thing. :(

This thing is junk.

Thank for the link, though, NFS4. :)
It might be the obscene amount of cache on his SCSI controller...
 

Markfw

Moderator Emeritus, Elite Member
May 16, 2002
27,131
16,032
136
Originally posted by: MichaelD
Originally posted by: shuttleteam

Getting better, but still not capable of faithful results with intelligent i/o peripherals!

SCSI RAID

SATA RAID on Lsi MR SATA-6

Plain old ATA-100

Cheers!

Thank you! Glad I'm not the only one to see that. I got better results with a single Maxtor 40 GB drive than I did with my SCSI RAID-0 stripe with two 15K rpm drives! :roll:

But your SCSI raid results look pretty good, Shuttleteam. :confused: Must be that whole PCI-X thing. :(

This thing is junk.

Thank for the link, though, NFS4. :)

Ditto, did you see mine ??? This thing blows chunks.....
 

MDE

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
13,199
1
81
Originally posted by: shuttleteam
It might be the obscene amount of cache on his SCSI controller...

Ok here is the same array with cache turned OFF.

results

Cheers!
Not so impressive now, is it? :p

How much cache do you have on that bad boy again?
 

sharkeeper

Lifer
Jan 13, 2001
10,886
2
0
Not so impressive now, is it?

How much cache do you have on that bad boy again?

Well the STR looks better with the cache OFF if you believe in this benchmark.

Performance is much, much faster with the cache and advanced options ON.

When the cache is OFF, burst speed metric is showing burst speed from disk 0 on ch 0 according to the disk annunciator. When the cache is on, burst speed is being read from the cache. Other programs show much higher bursts approaching 1 GB/S.

There is 1GB of PC3200 DDR cache and a Li Ion battery that allows this to be retained for 100 hours at full charge in the event SD commit terminates during an abrupt shutdown during condition of anomaly.

Cheers!
 

MDE

Lifer
Jul 17, 2003
13,199
1
81
Originally posted by: shuttleteam
Not so impressive now, is it?

How much cache do you have on that bad boy again?

Well the STR looks better with the cache OFF if you believe in this benchmark.

Performance is much, much faster with the cache and advanced options ON.

When the cache is OFF, burst speed metric is showing burst speed from disk 0 on ch 0 according to the disk annunciator. When the cache is on, burst speed is being read from the cache. Other programs show much higher bursts approaching 1 GB/S.

There is 1GB of PC3200 DDR cache and a Li Ion battery that allows this to be retained for 100 hours at full charge in the event SD commit terminates during an abrupt shutdown during condition of anomaly.

Cheers!
I'd assume that the bursts would max out the bus you have the controller on (PCI-X right?). I just think that it's insane that your SCSI card has double the RAM of my PC!
 

sharkeeper

Lifer
Jan 13, 2001
10,886
2
0
I'd assume that the bursts would max out the bus you have the controller on (PCI-X right?). I just think that it's insane that your SCSI card has double the RAM of my PC!

In theory it should since the HBA specification shows the cache memory bandwidth capable of 1.6 GB/S transfers. The HBA is running at 133 MHz PCI-X currently which has (ABMAX) 1024 MB/S bandwidth.

Cheers!
 

dwendel

Junior Member
Jan 7, 2001
11
0
0
I think a lot of the low burst read scores is directly related to low bus speed or poor memory performance.


Heres my result.

Burst 206
Average 103
Randon access 8.7
CPU 4%

2 36g Raptors Raid on a IS7 Board
running at 3.1GHz bus speed of around 240 I think.

 

InlineFive

Diamond Member
Sep 20, 2003
9,599
2
0
Specs are in my sig (AXP 3200+, 512MB, 80GB SATA DM9+)

Short:

Burst: 118.4
Avg: 48.9
14.9 ms
0% CPU


Long:

Burst 112.3
Avg: 49.0
15.2 ms
0% CPU
 

aug1516

Senior member
Apr 12, 2001
282
0
0
Short
Burst - 129.2mbps
Avg - 74.7mbps
RA - 5.5ms
CPU - 5%

Long
Burst - 129.2mbps
Avg - 74.5mbps
RA - 5.5ms
CPU - 5%

Seemed to give pretty accurate results for my Fujitsu 15k SCSI drives.
 

WebDude

Golden Member
Oct 11, 1999
1,648
0
0
I get some INSANE BURST SPEEDS. Don't know why, or what's going on. (Running sata raid0 off a built in Promise controller, 2 Hitachi 80gig drives, Athlon 64 3000+, MSI K8T Neo-FIS2R mb, 1 gig ram.)
Results (Blue is short, Red is long)