Trinitron,
<<Modus you can't deny Maxtors bad track record and IBM's good track record.>>
Yes, I can.
I've used more Maxtor drives in my systems than any other brand. Guess what? A certain small percentage fail. But it's the same percentage I see with every other brand.
As for IBM's, just browse through our forum archives and you'll come across at least two people whose 35GXP's failed after less than a month.
My point? There is no conclusive proof that any brand of hard drive is more or less reliable than any other brand of hard drive. Such an assesment would require years of controlled studies and extensive surveys.
<<Their not "all crap" in my dads corportae shop, their AS 400's run IBM HD's, as do their main frames and NT servers.>>
Well good for Daddy.
<<IBM has been making quality equiptment since the 60's, and has proven their quality.>>
Please. Intel's supposedly been making "quality" stuff since the late 70's. That didn't prevent the Pentium FDIV bug or the i820 recall fiasco. There is no magic quality that makes one company's products any better than another's. The workers, managers, and engineers come and go. Technology changes and equipment evolves. Manufacturing is outsourced to third world countries and companies sign cross-licensing agreements.
So I'm sorry to break it to you, but there's no such thing as a "quality brand name" anymore.
<<Such a blatently silly statement, I wouldn't buy a PC from you, sorry to say.>>
If you're going to try to insult me, at least learn to spell and write in complete sentences. This is pathetic.
Modus