HD DVD versus Blu-Ray

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Shawn

Lifer
Apr 20, 2003
32,236
53
91
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
So what if it's on two discs? Is it all that horrible? OMG OMG OMG, YOU NEED TO SWITCH DISCS..ARGHHGFHGHHHSDHFHDHHH!
It's horrible for sales. 99.999% of format neutral buyers, like me, will choose the Blu-Ray version if we don't have to swap discs in the middle of the movie.

People who use LOTR to jump into the HDM fray will likely make the same decision.

4th quarter (the all-important holiday season) will be in Blu Ray's favor.

Pirates 3, Spidey 3/Trilogy, Die Hard 4/Quadrilogy, Simpsons, Superbad, Cars, Ratatouille, ID4...

No way they are going to split up a movie onto 2 discs. They probably would however put the extras on a separate disc, which is no big deal. Many special edition DVDs come with the extras on a second disc.
 

LegendKiller

Lifer
Mar 5, 2001
18,256
68
86
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
So what if it's on two discs? Is it all that horrible? OMG OMG OMG, YOU NEED TO SWITCH DISCS..ARGHHGFHGHHHSDHFHDHHH!
It's horrible for sales. 99.999% of format neutral buyers, like me, will choose the Blu-Ray version if we don't have to swap discs in the middle of the movie.

People who use LOTR to jump into the HDM fray will likely make the same decision.

4th quarter (the all-important holiday season) will be in Blu Ray's favor.

Pirates 3, Spidey 3/Trilogy, Die Hard 4/Quadrilogy, Simpsons, Superbad, Cars, Ratatouille, ID4...

And you'll probably get half the features for the same price. Wow, great decision.

I doubt it will be in BD's favor significantly
 

Shawn

Lifer
Apr 20, 2003
32,236
53
91
Originally posted by: Wreckage
Originally posted by: LegendKiller

And you'll probably get half the features for the same price. Wow, great decision.

I doubt it will be in BD's favor significantly

Ha, ha, ha, ha.

News like this must really make you cry
http://www.engadgethd.com/2007...ales-lead-over-hd-dvd/
Blu-ray maintains 2-to-1 sales lead over HD DVD

*nearly

Meaning Blu-ray no longer has a 2-1 lead over HD DVD. Gotta love how engadget tries to make good news for HD DVD into bad news.
 

destrekor

Lifer
Nov 18, 2005
28,799
359
126
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
So what if it's on two discs? Is it all that horrible? OMG OMG OMG, YOU NEED TO SWITCH DISCS..ARGHHGFHGHHHSDHFHDHHH!
It's horrible for sales. 99.999% of format neutral buyers, like me, will choose the Blu-Ray version if we don't have to swap discs in the middle of the movie.

People who use LOTR to jump into the HDM fray will likely make the same decision.

4th quarter (the all-important holiday season) will be in Blu Ray's favor.

Pirates 3, Spidey 3/Trilogy, Die Hard 4/Quadrilogy, Simpsons, Superbad, Cars, Ratatouille, ID4...

And you'll probably get half the features for the same price. Wow, great decision.

I doubt it will be in BD's favor significantly

half the features? what, exactly, are you talking about?

and no movie is ever going to require swapping discs during the movie. ever. no movie has ever done that, not that I recall (speaking in reference to optical disc movies, not VHS ;)). At best, they'd simply use as much compression as necessary for each given medium, and use a second disc for extra content. BD would naturally have a higher bitrate if they used BD50 for the movie disc, and a BD25 for the second disc, with the HD DVD version having two 30gb discs.

as far as features, about the only thing BD is now missing is internet-enabled content. Big deal, most people don't care about that shit. It's a rather pointless feature and allows the studios to leave out content from the disc instead of including it in the first place. IMHO, it's BS.
picture in picture is coming to BD, how many titles will be using it soon I don't know. The spec allows for it now, and studios are going to prefer BD+'s copy-protection over HD DVDs. As much as DRM is a bitch for consumers, it's heaven for studios. The other features of HD DVD are in BD v1.1 as well, advanced bookmarking and whatnot.
 

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
Originally posted by: destrekor
and no movie is ever going to require swapping discs during the movie. ever. no movie has ever done that, not that I recall (speaking in reference to optical disc movies, not VHS ;)).
They do. Lord of the Rings Extended Edition spanned two dvds. I've also got a copy of Goodfellas that has to be flipped over midway through the movie.
 

Shawn

Lifer
Apr 20, 2003
32,236
53
91
Originally posted by: cubby1223
Originally posted by: destrekor
and no movie is ever going to require swapping discs during the movie. ever. no movie has ever done that, not that I recall (speaking in reference to optical disc movies, not VHS ;)).
They do. Lord of the Rings Extended Edition spanned two dvds. I've also got a copy of Goodfellas that has to be flipped over midway through the movie.

Uhh, my copy of Goodfellas doesn't have to be flipped over.
 

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
Originally posted by: Shawn
*nearly

Meaning Blu-ray no longer has a 2-1 lead over HD DVD. Gotta love how engadget tries to make good news for HD DVD into bad news.
Nearly what? The latest Nielson/Videoscan numbers were 70:30 Blu-ray.

It'll swing with Transformers, then there's Spider-man 3 next week, Ratatouille and Cars the next week. Couple more weeks is Die Hard, followed by Pirates 3, High School Musical, Harry Potter, Simpsons Movie. That's a lot of exclusive numbers ahead before Christmas (Harry Potter dual release of course). After that, Rush Hour 3, Shoot 'Em Up, War, 3:10 to Yuma, 4 more exclusive or timed exclusive sales numbers in late Dec & early Jan.
 

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
Originally posted by: Shawn
Uhh, my copy of Goodfellas doesn't have to be flipped over.
I got the one from 1997, before dual layer dvds were in production. Flipper dvds were used a lot back then to have widescreen & fullscreen on the same disc, and in the case of Goodfellas hold the entire widescreen movie.
 

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
Originally posted by: CorCentral
How long before we see $250.00 BluRay players?
End of next year possibly?

If so, will HD DVD players be $150.00 at the same time or lower?
I'm just curious on what everyone thinks the prices of both format players this time next year will be.
The new 40gb PS3 is $399, and all indications say it will be updated to profile 2.0. The other manufacturers will pretty much have to drop prices just to stay competitive against the PS3. If I guess, you'll have profile 2.0 players year from now for $200-$250. If HD DVD gains huge momentum, BD player prices will fall faster. If Blu-ray gains huge momentum, BD player prices will fall slower.
 

Eug

Lifer
Mar 11, 2000
24,165
1,809
126
1) Transformers on HD DVD is simply awesome.
2) The sound is stellar too. It also happens to get top ratings from a multitude of reviews.

Oh and Wal-Mart has the Toshiba HD-A2 for $198 next week, with 5 free movies.
 

Shawn

Lifer
Apr 20, 2003
32,236
53
91
Originally posted by: Eug
1) Transformers on HD DVD is simply awesome.
2) The sound is stellar too. It also happens to get top ratings from a multitude of reviews.

Oh and Wal-Mart has the Toshiba HD-A2 for $198 next week, with 5 free movies.

Yeah, it was pretty freaking cool. This thread shows some screenshots of the special features.
 

jpeyton

Moderator in SFF, Notebooks, Pre-Built/Barebones
Moderator
Aug 23, 2003
25,375
142
116
Originally posted by: Eug
Oh and Wal-Mart has the Toshiba HD-A2 for $198 next week, with 5 free movies.
Best Buy has the HD-A3 out this week.

$299.99 - $35.99 (12% Reward Zone coupon) = $263.99

You get:

300 (in the box)
The Bourne Identity (in the box)

Plus two free HD DVD titles instantly in-store (valued $34.99 or less)

Plus five free HD DVD titles by mail (choose from selected titles)

And you get a third generation player.
 

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
Originally posted by: zinfamous
what's your take on PQ for 2001 and Shining?
2001 A Space Odyssey is pure eye candy. They did a fantastic job with it, is very crisp, really looks like a true hd presentation. For comparison the last Blu-ray I watched was Warner's The Twilight Zone and that was not up to par. I'm sure the title 2001 A Space Odyssey demands a better transfer just because of what it is, and probably not too difficult considering there's no action in the movie... ever. First time I've seen it, and I know they're supposed to keep the home version as close to the theatrical release as possible... but certainly they could have made it a "director's cut" or something and taken out the 3 minutes of intermission! :Q And of course I've had that melody in my head for a long time all while visioning Homer in the spaceship eating the potato chips. ;) Careful, they're ruffled! Or Pierce Brosnan's voice for HAL. :laugh:

Never seen The Shining before either, probably watch it this weekend or something. Hope it's up to the same standard.

And the best thing about these movies is Warner put them out, everyone gets to enjoy them. :D But for the Kubrick collection put out, where's Dr. Strangelove? Certainly they could have done without Eyes Wide Shut and went with Strangelove instead. I still want my 3 hours back from watching that movie years ago...
 

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
Geez, next you'll be on me for not knowing what Bladerunner was. ;) I admit, I've seen very few early 80's & prior movies, just really know the ones that have been parodied a lot (like 2001 A Space Odyssey). But that's what's cool with these hi def releases, they're new too me!
 

Shawn

Lifer
Apr 20, 2003
32,236
53
91
You didn't know what Bladerunner was? :Q Anyway definitely check out The Shining. One of my favorite movies.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Originally posted by: cubby1223
Originally posted by: Genx87
It is a trend towards BluRay decline. That is what I meant by people deciding right now.
I dont really think they are that close in price. You can get Gen 2 HD-DVDs for 200 or less now or very soon. I dont see many sub 400 Blu Ray players yet.
No it's not a trend when you look at what's being analyzed.

Your starting point was a quarter when Blu-ray had many big hit releases while HD DVD released very little. We just passed the summer where HD DVD had many releases while Blu-ray had few. Now we are entering another period where there are far more Blu-ray releases than HD DVD releases. Oct. / Nov. / Dec. combined is like 130 Blu-ray, 80 HD DVD if I remember correctly, don't feel like counting them up.

If all releases were on both formats, then you can look at the sales numbers and pull out a trend. But most releases are exclusive releases and greatly vary in popularity from the mega success Transformers to the meh The Hills Have Eyes 2. That's why you look at Warner's releases for the better gauge of the format war's progression.

And when you factor in the cost of each movie, the $200 price difference in players is not that large, and that gap should be shrinking over the next year. Players are priced to be competitive, especially by the companies which will earn the most from royalties from disc sales.

At some point the sheer volume in the market will make each release less and less important. I believe we may be entering such a time. We have several million Blu Ray players in the market thanks to the PS3 and several hundred thousand HD-DVD players.

I really dont buy that 1 hit release is swaying these numbers as much as you claim. It may make 1 week look different. But long term sales trends wont be affected by a few releases.

 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: LegendKiller
So what if it's on two discs? Is it all that horrible? OMG OMG OMG, YOU NEED TO SWITCH DISCS..ARGHHGFHGHHHSDHFHDHHH!
It's horrible for sales. 99.999% of format neutral buyers, like me, will choose the Blu-Ray version if we don't have to swap discs in the middle of the movie.

People who use LOTR to jump into the HDM fray will likely make the same decision.

4th quarter (the all-important holiday season) will be in Blu Ray's favor.

Pirates 3, Spidey 3/Trilogy, Die Hard 4/Quadrilogy, Simpsons, Superbad, Cars, Ratatouille, ID4...

I'd bee surprised if HD-DVD doesnt gain more ground over the holiday season due to their lower hardware prices. With Walmart selling A2's for sub 200 many many people will pick up a HD-DVD player and movies to go with it.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Originally posted by: cubby1223
Originally posted by: CorCentral
How long before we see $250.00 BluRay players?
End of next year possibly?

If so, will HD DVD players be $150.00 at the same time or lower?
I'm just curious on what everyone thinks the prices of both format players this time next year will be.
The new 40gb PS3 is $399, and all indications say it will be updated to profile 2.0. The other manufacturers will pretty much have to drop prices just to stay competitive against the PS3. If I guess, you'll have profile 2.0 players year from now for $200-$250. If HD DVD gains huge momentum, BD player prices will fall faster. If Blu-ray gains huge momentum, BD player prices will fall slower.

They better start falling before they lose their grasp on the market. A 14% swing in HD-DVDs favor in the past 3 qtrs should get them into gear.


 

cubby1223

Lifer
May 24, 2004
13,518
42
86
Originally posted by: Genx87
They better start falling before they lose their grasp on the market. A 14% swing in HD-DVDs favor in the past 3 qtrs should get them into gear.
You're still giving the consumer too much credit. Studios have more power to determine the outcome than consumers do.

It was completely different back with dvd vs. divx, as there was a drastic difference in usability. Not so with Blu-ray vs. HD DVD, for all practical purposes they are close enough to be considered equal technologies. Like I always joked with the dvd-/+r formats when anyone asked, the only difference is who collects the royalty payments.

We can get into the gritty details that make them different, but in reality they are not major like the format wars in the past. Even go back to vhs/beta, one is recordable and has many more uses, the other is not.
 

Eug

Lifer
Mar 11, 2000
24,165
1,809
126
Originally posted by: jpeyton
Originally posted by: Eug
Oh and Wal-Mart has the Toshiba HD-A2 for $198 next week, with 5 free movies.
Best Buy has the HD-A3 out this week.

$299.99 - $35.99 (12% Reward Zone coupon) = $263.99

You get:

300 (in the box)
The Bourne Identity (in the box)

Plus two free HD DVD titles instantly in-store (valued $34.99 or less)

Plus five free HD DVD titles by mail (choose from selected titles)

And you get a third generation player.
The A3 and A2 are very similar in functionality. Any previous problems with the A2 are just corrected in firmware updates.

I was hoping the A3 would be a bit faster, but apparently it isn't. They're both way faster than the A1 though. (I had the A1 briefly but hated its clunky feel and its lack of speed).
 

zinfamous

No Lifer
Jul 12, 2006
111,904
31,433
146
Originally posted by: cubby1223
Originally posted by: zinfamous
what's your take on PQ for 2001 and Shining?
2001 A Space Odyssey is pure eye candy. They did a fantastic job with it, is very crisp, really looks like a true hd presentation. For comparison the last Blu-ray I watched was Warner's The Twilight Zone and that was not up to par. I'm sure the title 2001 A Space Odyssey demands a better transfer just because of what it is, and probably not too difficult considering there's no action in the movie... ever. First time I've seen it, and I know they're supposed to keep the home version as close to the theatrical release as possible... but certainly they could have made it a "director's cut" or something and taken out the 3 minutes of intermission! :Q And of course I've had that melody in my head for a long time all while visioning Homer in the spaceship eating the potato chips. ;) Careful, they're ruffled! Or Pierce Brosnan's voice for HAL. :laugh:

Never seen The Shining before either, probably watch it this weekend or something. Hope it's up to the same standard.

And the best thing about these movies is Warner put them out, everyone gets to enjoy them. :D But for the Kubrick collection put out, where's Dr. Strangelove? Certainly they could have done without Eyes Wide Shut and went with Strangelove instead. I still want my 3 hours back from watching that movie years ago...


I agree with Strangelove. But I think Eyes seems to get trashed mroe than it deserves. Still a beuatiful film to watch. Esp when you consider it was all sound stage.
 

JC86

Senior member
Jan 18, 2007
694
0
0
AS Michael Bay put it:
?It's short-sighted and it has delayed consumers' moving to HD (home video). As a director, my critical eye is that Blu-ray is where my money is. Consumers are smart, and they are going to wait it out.?

I was hoping Bay would hint at how long this exclusivity deal with Paramount is since it feels like the Paramount deal was hail mary for HD DVD and if they can't catch up or surpass BD before the deal runs out, they're going to be in trouble.

Next summer's blockbuster's are probably going to be a major deciding factor when they're released on HD DVD and BD.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Originally posted by: cubby1223
Originally posted by: Genx87
They better start falling before they lose their grasp on the market. A 14% swing in HD-DVDs favor in the past 3 qtrs should get them into gear.
You're still giving the consumer too much credit. Studios have more power to determine the outcome than consumers do.

It was completely different back with dvd vs. divx, as there was a drastic difference in usability. Not so with Blu-ray vs. HD DVD, for all practical purposes they are close enough to be considered equal technologies. Like I always joked with the dvd-/+r formats when anyone asked, the only difference is who collects the royalty payments.

We can get into the gritty details that make them different, but in reality they are not major like the format wars in the past. Even go back to vhs/beta, one is recordable and has many more uses, the other is not.

You are right they are nearly identical technologies which means price more than anything will determine what the consumer buys. If you have two apples from two different vendors. Why would you buy the more expensive nearly identical apple over the cheaper one?