HD 2500 as good as HD 4000 in 2D?

Erva

Member
Dec 29, 2008
31
0
0
Hi.

I'm choosing between two Ivy Bridge CPU:s with either HD 2500 or HD 4000 graphics. I would only use the onboard graphics for tasks such as playing video files, browsing the web, and editing documents.

Is there any performance gap between the two for such tasks, however slight, or does it only manifest itself in 3D applications like games?
 

Ventanni

Golden Member
Jul 25, 2011
1,432
142
106
You'll never notice the difference in general usage. For standard 2D and video playback acceleration, just about any GPU is more than adequate these days for just about any task.
 

ShintaiDK

Lifer
Apr 22, 2012
20,378
146
106
There is a difference in video processing between HD3000 and HD4000, so I imagine that gap is wider when looking at the HD2500.

http://anandtech.com/show/5773/intels-ivy-bridge-an-htpc-perspective

They use the same dedicated hardware. So there shouldnt be any difference.

ivybridgemedia.jpg.jpeg
 
Last edited:

Piroko

Senior member
Jan 10, 2013
905
79
91
There is a difference in video processing between HD3000 and HD4000, so I imagine that gap is wider when looking at the HD2500.
The HD 2000 and 3000 are the same series and share the same features (Sandybridge), the HD 2500 and 4000 are the same series and share the same features (Ivybridge).
I'm not aware of a difference between the HD 2500 and 4000 in 2d mode.
 

SaurusX

Senior member
Nov 13, 2012
993
0
41
The HD 2000 and 3000 are the same series and share the same features (Sandybridge), the HD 2500 and 4000 are the same series and share the same features (Ivybridge).
I'm not aware of a difference between the HD 2500 and 4000 in 2d mode.

Ah. This makes more sense to me.