• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Hawaii may keep track of all Web sites visited

Status
Not open for further replies.
Whoaa, a thread thats actually not about Israel/Jews. As for the subject at hand, its a dangerous slippery slop IMHO. Not good at all!
 
Last edited:
Destined for failure.

I thought a couple of points were funny:
1) The Senator who introduced that chamber's bill, Jill Tokuda, basically said "Fuck if I know what the hell legislation my name is on but I'll do it anyway."
2) The whole thing is one person's overreaction to what she thinks is defamation. Rather than sue the alleged defamer civilly she tries to infringe upon everyone's privacy.
 
How is logging everyone's Internet history going to stop the (perceived) problem that the bill is for (making an allegedly libellous website)?
It's not like visiting the site would be illegal.
 
🙄 Its good to see leaders putting so much thought and effort into understanding the laws they are trying to pass. Good christ - its like none of them have any basic idea on how the internet works

Sadly that might even be a good thing. The proposed laws are so idiotically bad for businesses (in addition to the obvious pricavy issues) that is virtually certain that companies will fight things like this
 
Yup its total crap. They cant stop you from running an encrypted connection to anywhere that does not have such ridiculous unconstitutional laws. So they cant see everything, especially those that dont want to be seen. There is and has always been one primary reason for government to spy: to gain information insiders can use to make money.
 

You do realize that even if some idiot pols managed to get something like that passed in Hawaii it would not necessarily stand in even in Hawaii, much less spread to the other 49 states? For what it's worth there is already a followup article on the original CNET article with the pinheaded pol that proposed it backing off and "clarifying" what she meant.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top