• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Have your children shot!

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
So, what you're saying is you have zero evidence of doctors (any amount, let alone many) recommending staying away from this particular vaccine?

My words were they are not recommending it. I never said doctors are telling people to not take it/stay away from it.
 
Like I already mentioned feel free to make this some crazy ass debate all over the place and feel free to use the vaccine.

There isn't really a lot on this other than the percentages of people getting the vaccine are not as high as expected and many are not even being offered it.

You can do what you want. I am not saying not to.

I'm gonna take that last one as an admission of defeat. You're declining to offer any proof because you have no proof; and now suddenly you want to drop the stupid argument that you started, pretending that you never even implied that there might be something wrong with the vaccine.

You think you're playing a game of whack-a-mole with us, where you pop up over here with some obvious trollbait, only to duck down and over to a different position as soon as you get called out on it, always moving the goalposts. You like to think you're always one step ahead of us and the ultimate badass trollmachine, but the only thing more inflated than your ego is your codpiece, and both are quite transparent.
 
Yeah, what you said were the only ones that are pushing it are shills for pharmaceutical companies...

Not exactly, I was referring to many of the things your doctor recommends is because he was asked to.

If there is not a great harm, they will usually do so if the money is right.

That is why some doctors recommend a lesser brand of a medication among non-generics.
 
I'm gonna take that last one as an admission of defeat. You're declining to offer any proof because you have no proof; and now suddenly you want to drop the stupid argument that you started, pretending that you never even implied that there might be something wrong with the vaccine.

You think you're playing a game of whack-a-mole with us, where you pop up over here with some obvious trollbait, only to duck down and over to a different position as soon as you get called out on it, always moving the goalposts. You like to think you're always one step ahead of us and the ultimate badass trollmachine, but the only thing more inflated than your ego is your codpiece, and both are quite transparent.

You can believe whatever the fuck you want. I have given up doing others homework for them as almost any time I have taken the time to do that, it falls on deaf ears or those that don't understand or 'oh that's just google'.

The vaccine doesn't have to be a problem itself to cause problems.

I'd look into MRSA/VRSA and although bacterial in nature shows how certain preventatives are not always in our best interest as a species.
 
this is one vaccine i really had my doubts on. As alky said not all doctors are 100% for it. though tons of research is coming in saying its good for girls. when i asked my sons pediatrician he wasn't for it for males.
 
this is one vaccine i really had my doubts on. As alky said not all doctors are 100% for it. though tons of research is coming in saying its good for girls. when i asked my sons pediatrician he wasn't for it for males.

It wasn't approved for males simply because the testing hadn't been done. They've since tested it on males and (no surprise) it works about the same. Don't know if it's been approved yet.
 
I've seen commercials on TV recently that recommended it for boys now as well. My son is quite a few years away from it still, but I remember thinking that he'd be getting it when the time came.
 
It wasn't approved for males simply because the testing hadn't been done. They've since tested it on males and (no surprise) it works about the same. Don't know if it's been approved yet.

Right.

My issue's it seemed they were trying t make it mandatory for both sexes before any testing came back. It looked like a money grab by the company. It put many off.

This is one vaccine that made many people question it who weren't in teh idiot anti-vac camp.
 
Right.

My issue's it seemed they were trying t make it mandatory for both sexes before any testing came back. It looked like a money grab by the company. It put many off.

This is one vaccine that made many people question it who weren't in teh idiot anti-vac camp.

Well, I will say I though Tx Gov Rick Perry's push to make it mandatory was loathsome.
 
Back
Top