Have a question about amd to intel ghz.
- Thread starter DfiDude
- Start date
But is there like an equation for putting it in intel terms, like a 1.8 ghz amd is equivalent to a 3 ghz intel, so then what does a 2.7 ghz equal to in intel ghz, just trying to summarize it for you heh.
thecoolnessrune
Diamond Member
- Jun 8, 2005
- 9,673
- 583
- 126
Tell me if I'm wrong, but I believe its these terms:
Venice, San Diego: AMD Ghz x 1.55= Intel Ghz equivalent
Clawhammer, Sledgehammer: AMD Ghz x 1.5= Intel Ghz equivalent
I wouldn't know calculations for X2 or PD.
Venice, San Diego: AMD Ghz x 1.55= Intel Ghz equivalent
Clawhammer, Sledgehammer: AMD Ghz x 1.5= Intel Ghz equivalent
I wouldn't know calculations for X2 or PD.
So, e.g a 3700+ SD, 2.2GHz x 1.55 = P4 3.41GHz? That doesn't seem right...
A 3700+ SD would own even a 3.8GHz P4 in games...
It's true, but the processor is named 3700+ for a reason.
A 3500+ is a good competitor against a Pentium 4 560.
Athlons perform very well in floating point calculations, so in "equally" rated CPUs, they will best Intel's for games. The opposite is usually true for productivity software.
thecoolnessrune
Diamond Member
- Jun 8, 2005
- 9,673
- 583
- 126
they are a great website and give usually good reviews. i do not always agree with them but i still like them
that cpu chart is very valuable to a lot of people
There is NOT a conversion factor. The PR rating is based on real work. AMD has the numbers certified independantly.
Regarding the radar gun, thats absolute BS. Megaherz is a meaningless indicator of processor speed. Intel cpus work like a production line with 30 people. Each station does very little work, hence the production line moved quickly. Big problem, bad analogy, you get to station 25 and find out that all the products on the line needed power mirrors, everything on the line that has been produced so far is garbage. (Flush the trace cache).
AMD fewer workers doing much more work at each station, better branch prediction, better cache algorithm, must better hyper-transport, much better memory controller on cpu die, much better dual cpu, designed in, not two loosely stitched together only communicating via the fsb. I can go on and on. A benchmark can show exactly what you want it to show.
Regarding the radar gun, thats absolute BS. Megaherz is a meaningless indicator of processor speed. Intel cpus work like a production line with 30 people. Each station does very little work, hence the production line moved quickly. Big problem, bad analogy, you get to station 25 and find out that all the products on the line needed power mirrors, everything on the line that has been produced so far is garbage. (Flush the trace cache).
AMD fewer workers doing much more work at each station, better branch prediction, better cache algorithm, must better hyper-transport, much better memory controller on cpu die, much better dual cpu, designed in, not two loosely stitched together only communicating via the fsb. I can go on and on. A benchmark can show exactly what you want it to show.
Hi, I don't think there is an equation. For example a 1200+ AMD was actually clocked at 900Mhz. AMD's claim was that it processed the same speed as an Intel 1.2 gig, thus the 1200+ designation. The best way to find out is to look the AMD in question up at an online seller's site. Most give the actual clock freq. with the listings. Jim
you're an idiot...the RADAR GUN shows us that the amd is faster. pretend there are 2 sprinters. 1 guy with long legs, and another with short super super fast legs. the guy with super duper fast legs may get him far, but the guy with long and still fast legs will win the race (/pretend).
You're wrong. I did high school track for many years and in sprinting, the guy w/ faster turnover always wins over the guy w/ longer legs. (The guy w/ longer legs is also more energy inefficient) It's in distance where the longer legs help you win over the guys w/ shorter legs.
But I do get what you're getting at w/ CPUs
To reach an equivalent P4 Mhz for AMD cpus = Mhz x 150% + 5%(if dual channel)+ 2%(if 1MB cache).
So for example an FX-55 =2600mhz x 157% = 4082
Another example, Venice 3200+ = 2000mhz x 155% = 3100
So for example an FX-55 =2600mhz x 157% = 4082
Another example, Venice 3200+ = 2000mhz x 155% = 3100
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 23K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
-
Facebook
Twitter