Originally posted by: Pothead
If you go a few posts up, you would see this thread was from November.
Originally posted by: Slogun
Originally posted by: Pothead
If you go a few posts up, you would see this thread was from November.
Yea, point is one shouldn't need to enter a post to find out it's DEAD and outdated. That's why you see "Edit: DEAD" properly entered on threads where the deal is dead.
Originally posted by: MrPeacock
According to Hauppauge's product comparison page the only thing that the 250 has over the 150 is the hardware Video CD encoder. If I had known that, I would have waited for the 150 to come out, rather than buying the 350. OTOH, the 350 has better support, so maybe not. It's a toss-up, really.Originally posted by: ThaPerculator
EDIT: Correction, the 150 HAS hardware encoding... my bad. In that case, I have no clue what the difference is. Hauppauge makes good $hit, though.
Originally posted by: dclive
Originally posted by: joecool
hey, i've currently got a cheapo avertv card and running snapstream, will the encoder on this card make a huge difference in system performance when recording a show? i've got a p4 2.6c, 1gb of pc3200, abit is7 mobo, and a couple of sata drives - save the video to the drive that DOESN'T have the os on it. but i still get an occasional skip in the recorded shows - is it my system or snapstreams crappy codec?
With MCE2005 and a Maui-based MPEG2 encoder card, I'm using essentially no CPU time on a AMD3000 while recording. Playing back, OTOH, uses CPU time (it's still not that much...) but encoding doesn't use a thing.
I had an AMD1800 with 512M that did just as well in MCE2004 with this same card; you don't need a remotely fast CPU to encode video - it's very easy on the CPU.
Originally posted by: bupkus
Originally posted by: dclive
Originally posted by: joecool
hey, i've currently got a cheapo avertv card and running snapstream, will the encoder on this card make a huge difference in system performance when recording a show? i've got a p4 2.6c, 1gb of pc3200, abit is7 mobo, and a couple of sata drives - save the video to the drive that DOESN'T have the os on it. but i still get an occasional skip in the recorded shows - is it my system or snapstreams crappy codec?
With MCE2005 and a Maui-based MPEG2 encoder card, I'm using essentially no CPU time on a AMD3000 while recording. Playing back, OTOH, uses CPU time (it's still not that much...) but encoding doesn't use a thing.
I had an AMD1800 with 512M that did just as well in MCE2004 with this same card; you don't need a remotely fast CPU to encode video - it's very easy on the CPU.
Two years ago I bought a Leadtek WINFAST TV/2000XP DELUXE TV/FM and never use it as playback is too jerky. Is it possible to buy an encoder card to augment the Leadtek's performance? My intent is to use MCE 2005.
No. You'd toss the Winfast and get a $60-$70 Hauppauge MPEG2 card, and you're off to the races.
Originally posted by: uwannawhat
No. You'd toss the Winfast and get a $60-$70 Hauppauge MPEG2 card, and you're off to the races.
Absolutely! Add a TV programing software such as SageTV or BeyondTV & you've got you're own TIVO with not monthly fees!
Originally posted by: uwannawhat
No. You'd toss the Winfast and get a $60-$70 Hauppauge MPEG2 card, and you're off to the races.
Absolutely! Add a TV programing software such as SageTV or BeyondTV & you've got you're own TIVO with not monthly fees!
Originally posted by: THRILLHOv
from the looks of hauppauge's site, it seems the MCE cards will work on XPpro/home w/ beyond TV .... any one confirm? and if so, whats the difference... right now i have a wintvgo ($20) that does software and looks Great with its own software, but only so so in beyond tv.