Both chipsets support both. Its only a motherboard implementation.
You can already buy Xeons with 4Ghz and above turbo.
How sure are you of the bolded? Are there any Z87 boards out that have announced support for Broadwell?
Both chipsets support both. Its only a motherboard implementation.
You can already buy Xeons with 4Ghz and above turbo.
Does it really matter, since intel @14nm is only going to be about 10% faster than intel @22nm? (Sans the gpu, which is useless anyway.)
Meanwhile, intel's mobile competition, qualcomm, apple, etc, are each looking to increase their per core performance by 50% or more in 2014. Now that is progress. Intel can choke on their big fat margins.
That isn't very surprising since it's just a die shrink.Does it really matter, since intel @14nm is only going to be about 10% faster than intel @22nm? (Sans the gpu, which is useless anyway.)
Does it really matter, since intel @14nm is only going to be about 10% faster than intel @22nm? (Sans the gpu, which is useless anyway.)
Meanwhile, intel's mobile competition, qualcomm, apple, etc, are each looking to increase their per core performance by 50% or more in 2014. Now that is progress. Intel can choke on their big fat margins.
I wonder what is the battery life on a 3GHz ARM chip is like though. Would be impressive if the power draw remains the same or lower as the current top-of-the-line chip.
power consumption generally increases in proportion to operating frequency.
Is there even going to be a Broadwell version for the desktop? Has the rumor that it won't make it been rebutted? If not well, then the release dates make perfect sense.
http://www.fudzilla.com/home/item/32524-broadwell-won%E2%80%99t-make-it-to-desktop
Broadwell-K is on the roadmap. Rumors of Iris Pro graphics being included on it. Maybe it is on both, maybe just the i7. Only Intel knows right now.
It might only be two dies - DC + GT3 for the Ultrabooks, and QC + GT3e for the high end laptops, Broadwell-K and Xeons (which the latter 2 will be 50-70 more than the Haswell Refresh GT2 version). Could be a DC + GT2 for Ultrabooks as well, but only the less than 10W models.
I could have sworn that SATA Express was dead. It doesn't matter anyway -- this year is the year of the affordable PCI-E SSD.So with all that said,does it make any sense to build a Haswell high-ish end rig now?I mean,if rumors are true,I can't be excited about Z97.Sata Express is cool,but I'm quite sure the SSDs that support it and take advantage of it will be prohibitively expensive initially.I suppose I'll be okay with a 4770k and a Asus Maximus VI Formula,but it's too expensive of a setup to just want to throw it away for something newer in a few months time.
isnt't Haswell refresh = broadwell ?
just like ivy bridge is sandy bridge with smaller nm
I could have sworn that SATA Express was dead. It doesn't matter anyway -- this year is the year of the affordable PCI-E SSD.
SATA Express is removed from the 9 series chipsets. And thank god for that. Worst connector in history perhaps.
It really makes sense (2 dies only) if you think about it. Those two represent the high margin parts Intel craves while letting "new" Haswell Refresh fill in the rest of the lineup. They probably aren't comfortable putting <$275 Core on 14 nm yet given how expensive the wafers must be and how lousy the yield has been.
Long live being stuck at SATA-3 for another 2 years then!
power consumption generally increases in proportion to operating frequency.
Only if supply voltage is kept constant otherwise power will increase as the product of the frequency delta by the square of the supply voltage delta , increasing frequency by 30% and voltage by 20% will result to power being
increased by 1.3 x 1.2 x 1.2 = 1.872 ratio , that is 87.2%.
Just use PCIe SSDs. Its the same thing. Just without this: