Capital punishment was the norm. You got the stuffing walloped out of you on a regular basis, including for things such as being handicapped. None of this new-fangled special treatment - if a kid wasn't smart enough to learn, why, smacking around on a regular basis would knock the sense into them.
Originally posted by: Ornery
K-12 distance learning via the Internet
...and our time! jadinolf said, "...maybe we could have more dedicated (or smarter) teachers." THAT'S IT! And, he's right! Goddamn union protects the POS morons there today. Takes a flippin' act of Congress to get rid of one. You can't reward the good ones with bonuses or higher pay than their worthless coworkers. jadinolf offered a very viable possible reason for our current dilemma. What's yours? :|Originally posted by: badmouse
I was in school 50 years ago too, are you really that clueless? 50 years ago...
I know I'm wasting my breath...
Originally posted by: Ornery
"You're not allowed to discipline the children..."
What do they mean by discipline? Not allowed to smack them, or paddle them? Riddle me this: Why is it that some teachers have total control of a class, yet other teachers have a helluva time with the very same students?
Nice concise post, and you took the trouble to post a link. Nice! Too bad so many ATOT members don't read so well: "More money is my big generic solution..." :roll:Originally posted by: klah
The problem is obviously money. Washington D.C. only spends $13,187/yr per student. :roll:
http://ftp2.census.gov/govs/school/elsec02_sttables.xls
edit:fixed figure
Apologies! You are right, of course. I meant corporal punishment.Originally posted by: amdfanboy
Capital punishment was the norm. You got the stuffing walloped out of you on a regular basis, including for things such as being handicapped. None of this new-fangled special treatment - if a kid wasn't smart enough to learn, why, smacking around on a regular basis would knock the sense into them.
Text
Originally posted by: Ornery
Nice concise post, and you took the trouble to post a link. Nice! Too bad so many ATOT members don't read so well: "More money is my big generic solution..." :roll:Originally posted by: klah
The problem is obviously money. Washington D.C. only spends $13,187/yr per student. :roll:
http://ftp2.census.gov/govs/school/elsec02_sttables.xls
edit:fixed figure
Originally posted by: Ornery
What do they mean by discipline? Not allowed to smack them, or paddle them? Riddle me this: Why is it that some teachers have total control of a class, yet other teachers have a helluva time with the very same students?
Good lord, does that NOT seem like an obscene amount of money to you? That's the point! Throwing money at it has been tried and ain't fixing it!Originally posted by: JoeKing
So since the educational system is so hunky dory right now I guess we don't have to change anything then! Since the $13k doesn't seem to be working, maybe that's a sign we need to increase it.
Sorry, but that IS how it works! The exact same class of students listen to, and thrive with some teachers, yet wreak havoc in the classrooms of other teachers. Face it, some teachers suck bad, and thanks to their damn union, we can get rid of them!Sorry but that's not how it works. Often problem students are grouped together, though wrong, it happens. And maybe one year a child's famliy life is nice and everything is going great. And then the next year maybe there's a divorce or a death or a layoff or any event that can hurt a family life. Then the child begins to act out in the classroom.
Originally posted by: Ornery
Good lord, does that NOT seem like an obscene amount of money to you? That's the point! Throwing money at it has been tried and ain't fixing it!Originally posted by: JoeKing
So since the educational system is so hunky dory right now I guess we don't have to change anything then! Since the $13k doesn't seem to be working, maybe that's a sign we need to increase it.
Sorry, but that IS how it works! The exact same class of students listen to, and thrive with some teachers, yet wreak havoc in the classrooms of other teachers. Face it, some teachers suck bad, and thanks to their damn union, we can get rid of them!Sorry but that's not how it works. Often problem students are grouped together, though wrong, it happens. And maybe one year a child's famliy life is nice and everything is going great. And then the next year maybe there's a divorce or a death or a layoff or any event that can hurt a family life. Then the child begins to act out in the classroom.
I taught eurhythmics in a Waldorf school for a while. Do a little more research, you may want to rethink that.Originally posted by: djheater
I had a terrible, terrible experience in public school. That's why, even though I live in one of the BEST school districts in the state I'm sending my child to a Waldorf school.
Originally posted by: badmouse
I was in school 50 years ago too, are you really that clueless? 50 years ago black (we didn't call them that, we used a word I can't type here now without getting banned) students weren't welcome at my school, certainly - they went to their own school out of town, definately not a good one either.
Girls and boys had separate educational systems - girls didn't get to take a lot of things that boys did. Also, most students took "general" classes, "college prep" was reserved for the elite few. Girls didn't take math & science, they weren't considered to be smart enough.
And God forbid you came from another country and didn't speak the language perfectly. You were automatically considered to be a complete idiot. And heaven help you if you were Asian! Do you have any idea what the average American thought about those Japs (whether or not you were Japanese, Chinese, or whatever)?? We just won the war against all those heathens. God Bless America!!!
Capital punishment was the norm. You got the stuffing walloped out of you on a regular basis, including for things such as being handicapped. None of this new-fangled special treatment - if a kid wasn't smart enough to learn, why, smacking around on a regular basis would knock the sense into them.
Rape was considered "normal guy behavior". Handicapped girls were especially considered to be open season. Guys who were a little you-kno-what were also considered to be non-human, therefore they got raped a lot too - just to show them who was boss. DOES THAT MAKE ANY SENSE? Not to me either, but a lot of things about schools and people and fairness and crap like that didn't make sense either.
Teacher pay was a joke. Women were paid way less then men, it was written into the contracts. Men had a family to support, after all. A teaching job was not considered to be a fulltime job, and it didn't pay enough to support a family (unless you were male).
The idea that parents should be involved in schooling would have been laughable in the 50's & 60's - schooling was the teacher's job. The only reason my parents ever stepped foot into the school building was that my mother was a teacher - my father was head of the school board, and he never went near the place they met at city hall, not the school.
I know I'm wasting my breath and you just want to think that things were so much better in the "olden" days. They weren't.
AT teh end of each year, shoot they guy at the bottom of the class.Originally posted by: amdfanboy
I have noticed there is much more focus on following to rules than learning and it seems I'm not alone. Even in AP classes it seems like day care. Has it always been this way and how do you think it got this way? What do you think we can do to fix it?
Discus.