One could argue that it, because of laziness like you mentioned (or addiction), it definitely has contributed negatively toward our civilization; that is not, however, to say it has not contributed positively in such a way as to outweigh any detrimental effects. It's simply one of those things that brings about both some good and some bad.
That's one truth. I hate people now. Thanks, Internet!
Agreed. There has been quite a bit of research documenting a change in our thought-patterns, in the way we catalog information in our brain, and how much detail we remember.
We still retain the genetic/neural ability to grasp a large amount of detail surrounding any single subject/object/idea/concept; that is, however, something we have also let the internet do for us, and we instead just create "placeholders" in our brain. Suffice it to say, that is what various research has shown to be happening. Instead of remembering a great amount of detail that we can relate to others as we converse with them, we use placeholders that essentially act as keywords with which we locate the data on the internet whenever necessary.
That is one concept that I haven't really thought about in detail: how we shift our thought-patterns and sensory perception when in our more feral/natural state.
Do you think that the internet may play a role in a regression toward a more feral state of mind?
Our tribal tendencies have never disappeared, in fact, we may encourage them to blossom in some ways. I'd be curious to see how scholars debate the topic of other intrinsic patterns of thought, and how they have determined [or how they have been impacted by] the course of our technological advancements.