LIAR!Originally posted by: Spamela
i'll read it as soon as mrs. spamela can find it at costco.
Is it about the EPA and Bush's environmental policies?Originally posted by: dolph
if so, your thoughts?
What was Clinton's plan to destroy Al Queda? What specific warnings are you talking about?Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
chapter 16 is damning for bush and his total ignorance and incompetence in terms of terrorism before 9/11. clinton put out a hit on bin laden and tripled the anti terrorism budget and did many other things, which bush ignored. he ignored warnings from the previous administration, he ignored the plan to destroy al queda given to them by clinton created in his last weeks. he instead spent 60% of his time in texas ranches and stuff etc.
stuff on coulter/riely/goldberg/hannity also damning. like him or not, unlike conservative book whores, franken doesn't lie. i haven't finished it yet, but so far its been funny while shredding liars![]()
well, yes...but he ADMITS to lying. which is the key. no, it doesnt make it any less a lie, but at least he knows when he is wrong. besides, as posted above: its satire. maybe based in fact, but mostly underscored in order to prove a purpose.Originally posted by: Bigdude
Left-wing comedian Al Franken readily admits he lied in a letter to Attorney General John Ashcroft and others. And that's not all. Mr. Franken also admits to deception by misappropriating the letterhead from Harvard's Shorenstein Center for Press, Politics and Public Policy
The irony: Mr. Franken's new book is called "Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them."
This is laughable. Clinton passed on bin Laden at least 11 times. Look up Richard Miniter's new book on how Bill Clinton dropped the ball on bin Laden. Also, look up Monsoor Ijaz. He personally was involved with getting bin Laden handed over to the Clinton but Clinton passed it up. Clinton later admitted he let bin Laden go because he had no yet harmed America, but they knew he had plans to!Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
chapter 16 is damning for bush and his total ignorance and incompetence in terms of terrorism before 9/11. clinton put out a hit on bin laden and tripled the anti terrorism budget and did many other things, which bush ignored.
Left-wing comedian Al Franken readily admits he lied in a letter to Attorney General John Ashcroft and others. And that's not all. Mr. Franken also admits to deception by misappropriating the letterhead from Harvard's Shorenstein Center for Press, Politics and Public Policy
The irony: Mr. Franken's new book is called "Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them."
I heard this interview on NPR . . . you are incredibly disingenuous in your portrayal. Franken indeed posed as a fellow from Harvard (which was accurate) collecting information for a book about "heroes of abstinence" (which was a lie). Curiously, only four staffers replied to his letter and all of them claimed to be too busy to recount how they saved themselves for marriage . . . Condi's should be a short story b/c she's never been married. The letterhead would be consistent with his post (which was true) while giving credence to theLeft-wing comedian Al Franken readily admits he lied in a letter to Attorney General John Ashcroft and others. And that's not all. Mr. Franken also admits to deception by misappropriating the letterhead from Harvard's Shorenstein Center for Press, Politics and Public Policy
The irony: Mr. Franken's new book is called "Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them."
Discredited by who? Please provide a link if you can.Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
actually Monsoor Ijaz was discredited being unreliable and self serving, he only made the offer to further his own interests.
Again, provide a link to this investigation. As for assassination I never said anything about that so I have no idea what you are talking about.it was investigated and found not to be real. and frankly you don't sign an executive order for assassination if your not serious about it.
Congress was not involved in the Ijaz deal. It was Security Advisor Sandy Berger and AG Janet Reno.republicans were against clinton and thus any anti terrorism he supported.
Discredited by who? Please provide a link if you can.
Ijaz at that time was a major financial supporter of Clinton. He had worked a deal with the president of Sudan who wanted bin Laden out of the Sudan because he wanted "terrorism sanctions" lifted against his country. The Sudanese offered to arrest bin Laden and extradite him back to Saudi Arabia. The Saudis didn't want bin Laden so the Sudanese offered to arrest him and hand him over to the US. Clinton declined saying there wasn't enough evidence against bin Laden. Months later the Sudan kicked bin Laden out because of pressure from the US.
Ijaz has since challenged Senate Democrats to subpeona him to testify about pre 9-11 security. They have refused because they know the truth will hurt them and Clinton.
after the Embassy bombings, Clinton signed an executive order authorizing the assasination of Osama Bin Laden. no right wing rag is going to write much about that.Again, provide a link to this investigation. As for assassination I never said anything about that so I have no idea what you are talking about.
You have to have intellect to be intellectually dishonest. Not thier fault, kudos for setting the record straight, hopefully you used simple enough words.yet another prime example of how conservatives are intellectually dishonest,
I guess not, because you liberals still don't get it!hopefully you used simple enough words.
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
chapter 16 is damning for bush and his total ignorance and incompetence in terms of terrorism before 9/11. clinton put out a hit on bin laden and tripled the anti terrorism budget and did many other things, which bush ignored. he ignored warnings from the previous administration, he ignored the plan to destroy al queda given to them by clinton created in his last weeks. he instead spent 60% of his time in texas ranches and stuff etc.
stuff on coulter/riely/goldberg/hannity also damning. like him or not, unlike conservative book whores, franken doesn't lie. i haven't finished it yet, but so far its been funny while shredding liars![]()
Originally posted by: Linflas
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
chapter 16 is damning for bush and his total ignorance and incompetence in terms of terrorism before 9/11. clinton put out a hit on bin laden and tripled the anti terrorism budget and did many other things, which bush ignored. he ignored warnings from the previous administration, he ignored the plan to destroy al queda given to them by clinton created in his last weeks. he instead spent 60% of his time in texas ranches and stuff etc.
stuff on coulter/riely/goldberg/hannity also damning. like him or not, unlike conservative book whores, franken doesn't lie. i haven't finished it yet, but so far its been funny while shredding liars![]()
This book is footnoted and written by an investigative reporter. Is Franken's book the same or is it because you are politically in synch with Franken that you think that he is not a "book whore" and does not lie.
Losing Bin Laden: How Bill Clinton's Failures Unleashed Global Terror
Originally posted by: Linflas
Originally posted by: 0roo0roo
chapter 16 is damning for bush and his total ignorance and incompetence in terms of terrorism before 9/11. clinton put out a hit on bin laden and tripled the anti terrorism budget and did many other things, which bush ignored. he ignored warnings from the previous administration, he ignored the plan to destroy al queda given to them by clinton created in his last weeks. he instead spent 60% of his time in texas ranches and stuff etc.
stuff on coulter/riely/goldberg/hannity also damning. like him or not, unlike conservative book whores, franken doesn't lie. i haven't finished it yet, but so far its been funny while shredding liars![]()
This book is footnoted and written by an investigative reporter. Is Franken's book the same or is it because you are politically in synch with Franken that you think that he is not a "book whore" and does not lie.
Losing Bin Laden: How Bill Clinton's Failures Unleashed Global Terror
You are not even worth arguing with. Arguing with you is like chasing your own tail, it's a waste of energy.since he did nothing after gaining the office, there are two possibilities. he was lying. or he was incompetent.