- Oct 14, 1999
- 11,999
- 307
- 126
When Intel first released the P!!!-EB (Slot 1, 512K external L2, 133fsb) we had to endure the tenous prospects of either overclocking the BX chipset (synchronous memory) or the VIA Apollo Pro 133A (asynchronous), which we all know the BX was better for performance. Most graphics processors run asynchronous between their core and their memory. I was wondering if anyone has ever tested the efficiency of using synchronous timings on graphic cards versus asynchronous timings.
