Reference the Factcheck piece linked above, where the raised seal is clearly visible. It puts the lie to Cybr's bullshit.
I don't doubt it in the least. Pisses me off that birthers are so stupid they still bring up this BS.
Reference the Factcheck piece linked above, where the raised seal is clearly visible. It puts the lie to Cybr's bullshit.
He refuses to name the person, so that person can verify it is true. Check this out:
I heard from someone on the Internet that shira eats asian babies for breakfast twice a year, on the two equinoxes.
There, since I said I heard it from some unnamed source, it must be true - at least according to your logic. Now, everyone else will say it is a lie until it is properly sourced and vetted, but not you. You have to believe it is true if you wish your own logic to remain sound. So which is it, do you admit your own logic fails or do you admit you eat babies?
Your example is totally illogical. You're confusing the truth value of the claim "I was told xyz by someone at Bain" with the truth value of xyz.
You may well have "heard from someone on the Internet" that I eat babies. But that doesn't make the statement "shira eats babies" true.
Reid could easily be protecting a source who would get in serious trouble and lose his job at Bain if his identity were revealed. So it's completely believable that Reid could hear something highly controversial, report it, yet not reveal his source. News reporters do that kind of thing all the time.
It's easy to prove that YOU are a liar, since you've been caught in lies by the Mods, right here on ATPN. But you're claiming that Reid is a liar. Where's you proof?
Exactly, though I'm sure Cybrsage will evade you, just as he did me when I offered similar information. He has to stick to his script, you know.I'm going to give all of you a 'heads-up' on passports.
Only people born in Texas and California are required to provide long-form versions of their birth certificates to receive a passport. A very recently enacted regulation also requires that the parent or parents of an applicant be listed on the birth certificate.
President Obama could have, at any time, submitted an abstract from the state or even territory of Hawaii and still have received his passport. He would not have needed special treatment to do so.
And FYI, not all embossed seals or intaglio printings are going to show up on a digital scan. Sometimes they are so faint you can barely feel them when you run a finger over them. That doesn't mean they aren't there.
I just want 1 year of returns, 2009, when thousands of well heeled & felonious offshore tax evaders took an amnesty deal in the face of increased cooperation by tax haven govts, Switzerland being foremost. Nearly 15,000 took the deal.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/moneybox..._amnesty_what_he_doesn_t_want_us_to_see_.html
Mitt is very likely among them, which is why he's being so evasive. He can't afford to cop to that, which is why we'll never see his tax returns, ever.
Of course he paid all the taxes demanded by law, but only when the law was breathing down his neck... you're not a crook until you get busted, right? Or until you rat yourself out, which is what Mitt isn't doing...
I don't doubt it in the least. Pisses me off that birthers are so stupid they still bring up this BS.
They are not nearly as stupid as people asking for Romney's tax returns.
Reference the Factcheck piece linked above, where the raised seal is clearly visible. It puts the lie to Cybr's bullshit.
I'm going to give all of you a 'heads-up' on passports.
Only people born in Texas and California are required to provide long-form versions of their birth certificates to receive a passport. A very recently enacted regulation also requires that the parent or parents of an applicant be listed on the birth certificate.
President Obama could have, at any time, submitted an abstract from the state or even territory of Hawaii and still have received his passport. He would not have needed special treatment to do so.
And FYI, not all embossed seals or intaglio printings are going to show up on a digital scan. Sometimes they are so faint you can barely feel them when you run a finger over them. That doesn't mean they aren't there.
Your example is totally illogical. You're confusing the truth value of the claim "I was told xyz by someone at Bain" with the truth value of xyz.
You may well have "heard from someone on the Internet" that I eat babies. But that doesn't make the statement "shira eats babies" true.
Reid could easily be protecting a source who would get in serious trouble and lose his job at Bain if his identity were revealed. So it's completely believable that Reid could hear something highly controversial, report it, yet not reveal his source. News reporters do that kind of thing all the time.
It's easy to prove that YOU are a liar, since you've been caught in lies by the Mods, right here on ATPN. But you're claiming that Reid is a liar. Where's you proof?
They are not nearly as stupid as people asking for Romney's tax returns.
No one cares, Obama is President of the United States and was born in Hawaii, this whole birther rehashing is entirely pointless and stupid. It has nothing to do with Romney's taxes.
It is apparent the going loonie returner reason people are now mindlessly repeating is the "he has to be hiding something and neither the IRS nor the Secret Service could find it, but I will because I am much better at their jobs than they are" line of reasoning.
Keep it up!
Ah, so you are saying it is actually the "Cause he is following the tax law just like me and I am mad about it" loonie returner line of reasoning. Thanks for clarifying that, I do not want to get it wrong - it is hard to understand what the loonie returners are thinking at any given moment, it is so strange. It is like talking to a birther.
Ah, so you are saying it is actually the "Cause he is following the tax law just like me and I am mad about it" loonie returner line of reasoning. Thanks for clarifying that, I do not want to get it wrong - it is hard to understand what the loonie returners are thinking at any given moment, it is so strange. It is like talking to a birther.
Ah, cool, you cannot see it, but if they say they felt it then it is there. However, there is NO signature on that birth certificate. A signature is required by federal law. I posted it three times.