Come up with a rational reason for wanting to see the returns. Give it a shot. Prove to me that returners are not as loony as birthers, which is how they currently appear.
Once again, your ignorance and trolling is amazing.
And once again, you can't argue my facts, or defend your posts, so you are changing points again and going for false equivalence (just like in the other thread where you claimed the GOP wasn't racists, then when proved wrong, you tried to say the DNC was racist).
You are doing the same here. Birthers are in no way shape or form similar to this tax records controversy and are irrelevant to Romney's situation.
First off, several Republican state officials all verified his birth certificate. Oops, forgot that did you? The whackos like you wouldn't accept that, so Obama released his actual birth certificate. All legal proof for his citizenship was correctly and appropriately provided, and it's the whacko's that refuse to believe the facts (hmmm, just like you).
Romney's tax records, are legally protected from the government disclosing them, so they cannot release or comment on them. So Romney needs to release them himself.
It was good enough for his father and 90% of all candidates since.....what makes Romney special enough to buck the trend? Perhaps some embarrassing information?
Romney doesn't have to release them, but bucking the trend of 30 years shows he is either hiding something or really doesn't care what we think. Either way, not good for a candidate to have people not like him. He is running for President, which means he is working for us, so why shouldn't he?
Again, you neo-con types love to defend wiretapping and the like with "if you have nothing to hide, why worry?"......so turnabout is fair play.....if Romney has nothing to hide, why refuse to release them?