• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Harris Poll: Bush and Kerry Neck and Neck

I believe the Harris Poll is historically the most accurate, so I thought this warranted a thread:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The latest Harris Poll finds that the presidential election is now almost as close as it could possibly be, with Senator John Kerry and President George W. Bush virtually neck and neck (48% to 47%). This is better news for Senator Kerry than the previous poll which showed President Bush ahead of Senator Kerry.

(See Harris Poll #78, October 20 http://www.harrisinteractive.c...oll/index.asp?PID=507).

Today?s results are based on a nationwide Harris Poll of 2,493 likely voters conducted online by Harris Interactive® between October 21 and 25, 2004.

In the last poll we reported that the size of President Bush's lead varied substantially (from 2 to 8 percentage points) depending on which definition of likely voters we used. In this poll we find no such difference. Senator Kerry holds a one point lead using each of our possible definitions.

Of course, all polls are subject to sampling and other possible sources of error, but this new Harris Poll appears to confirm the findings of some other polls that President Bush?s modest lead last week has greatly narrowed or has disappeared. This survey also finds very little difference between the numbers for the popular vote as a whole and in seventeen swing states. In both cases the election is much too close to call.

During the 2000 elections, both Harris Interactive?s online and telephone polls were extremely accurate. (http://www.ncpp.org/poll_perform.htm).

TABLE 1

BUSH VS. KERRY

Q: "If the next presidential election were held today between George W. Bush for the Republicans, John Kerry for the Democrats and Ralph Nader as an Independent, for whom would you most likely vote?"

If respondent said "not sure/refused":

Q: "Well, if you had to say would you lean toward George W. Bush, John Kerry, or Ralph Nader?"

Base: Likely Voters*

George W. Bush - 47

John Kerry - 48

Ralph Nader - 1

Other - 1

Not sure/Refused - 2

* Likely Voters: Adults who are registered to vote and say they are "absolutely certain" to vote and that (if they were old enough) they voted in 2000.

NOTE: Percentages may not add up exactly to 100% due to rounding.

Methodology

The Harris Poll® was conducted online within the United States between October 21 and 25, 2004 among a nationwide cross section of 2,493 likely voters (Those registered to vote and absolutely certain to vote, and if they were old enough, they voted in 2000). Figures for age, sex, race, education, region and household income were weighted where necessary to bring them into line with their actual proportions in the population. Propensity score weighting was also used to adjust for respondents? propensity to be online.

In theory, with a probability sample of this size, one can say with 95 percent certainty that the results have a statistical precision of plus or minus 2 percentage points of what they would be if the entire U.S. adult population of likely voters had been polled with complete accuracy. Unfortunately, there are several other possible sources of error in all polls or surveys that are probably more serious than theoretical calculations of sampling error. They include refusals to be interviewed (non-response), question wording and question order, and weighting. It is impossible to quantify the errors that may result from these factors. This online sample was not a probability sample.

These statements conform to the principles of disclosure of the National Council on Public Polls.

W22300A

Q455, Q457
 
Average over all non-Partisan polls shows Bush up around 1.6% as of a few days ago. He had a 3.8% lead in 2000. We shall see how the undecideds and new voters go, assuming they count the votes.
 
meh...polls are worthless this late in the game. And, they typically lag a couple days behind to as long as two weeks depending on if it's a tracking poll or a normal phone poll.
 
Why even bother looking at these polls? The only poll that truly matters is whether the Redskins win on Sunday or not. Show me a poll more consistant than that and maybe I'll go along with you.
 
That is very good for Kerry. The MO is with Kerry, plus these polls understate Kerry voters, IMHO, and for all the reasons we've discussed before. Also, if the incumbent isn't ahead on election day he is in serious trouble historically.

Bush is toast and I am now convinced of it. He will be a crispy critter in Florida.

-Robert
 
Originally posted by: conjur
meh...polls are worthless this late in the game. And, they typically lag a couple days behind to as long as two weeks depending on if it's a tracking poll or a normal phone poll.

The last Harris Poll in 2000 was perfectly accurate as to the Gore/Bush race, though it had a 2% error rate re. Nader.
 
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: conjur
meh...polls are worthless this late in the game. And, they typically lag a couple days behind to as long as two weeks depending on if it's a tracking poll or a normal phone poll.

The last Harris Poll in 2000 was perfectly accurate as to the Gore/Bush race, though it had a 2% error rate re. Nader.
This election is far different from 2000. So many newly registered voters and a still-sizeable amount of undecideds.
 
Originally posted by: conjur
This election is far different from 2000. So many newly registered voters and a still-sizeable amount of undecideds.

I think both of those factors favor Kerry pretty strongly. My feeling at this point is he wins the popular and electoral votes by enough of a margin to stave off a lot of unneeded litigation.
 
Originally posted by: DonVito
Originally posted by: conjur
This election is far different from 2000. So many newly registered voters and a still-sizeable amount of undecideds.

I think both of those factors favor Kerry pretty strongly. My feeling at this point is he wins the popular and electoral votes by enough of a margin to stave off a lot of unneeded litigation.

Man, I hope you're right.
 
Originally posted by: Mayax
Wish they really were neck and neck.

One axe swing to lop off both their heads.

You might want to edit that - someone was banned the other day for a comment about pointing a gun at Kerry, and the mods have set a zero-tolerance policy for these kinds of posts.
 
DH:

NO! I'm an old Skins and Browns fan. Streaks are made to be broken. Every ball player knows that.

-Robert
 
Back
Top