• We should now be fully online following an overnight outage. Apologies for any inconvenience, we do not expect there to be any further issues.

Harriet Miers withdraws

Page 7 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

ExpertNovice

Senior member
Mar 4, 2005
939
0
0
Good. We need individuals who are known not to invent law but to interpret it. Such is the role the judicial branch is supposed to fill.

Unfortunately, it seems that the liberal educators are not teaching about separation of powers and it's importance.
 

Strk

Lifer
Nov 23, 2003
10,197
4
76
Originally posted by: zendari
Because she's 75 and wants to retire? And according to the liberals here she was one of the justices to "choose" Bush in 2000 anyway.

What does one have to do with the other? Yes, she wants to retire, but what does your second statement have to do with anything?
 

zendari

Banned
May 27, 2005
6,558
0
0
Originally posted by: Strk
Originally posted by: zendari
Because she's 75 and wants to retire? And according to the liberals here she was one of the justices to "choose" Bush in 2000 anyway.

What does one have to do with the other? Yes, she wants to retire, but what does your second statement have to do with anything?

The liberals seem to like her for some reason, even though she chose the hated evil Fuhrer.
 

Strk

Lifer
Nov 23, 2003
10,197
4
76
Originally posted by: zendari
Originally posted by: Strk
Originally posted by: zendari
Because she's 75 and wants to retire? And according to the liberals here she was one of the justices to "choose" Bush in 2000 anyway.

What does one have to do with the other? Yes, she wants to retire, but what does your second statement have to do with anything?

The liberals seem to like her for some reason, even though she chose the hated evil Fuhrer.

She was a moderate on most things, and even a bit liberal on a few of the more divisive things. There are not "for some reasons" floating around. The reasons liberals like her are pretty straight forward.

 

imported_tss4

Golden Member
Jun 30, 2004
1,607
0
0
Originally posted by: ExpertNovice
Good. We need individuals who are known not to invent law but to interpret it. Such is the role the judicial branch is supposed to fill.

Unfortunately, it seems that the liberal educators are not teaching about separation of powers and it's importance.

man, you never miss a chance. Liberals don't teach seperation of powers... You sound as dumb as the people here that go on about how the conservatives eat their young.
 

zendari

Banned
May 27, 2005
6,558
0
0
Bush narrows Supreme Court selection to 2, sources say

Text

WASHINGTON - Rebounding from the failed nomination of Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court, President Bush is poised to select between two of the nation's leading conservative federal appeals court judges - both experienced jurists with deep backgrounds in constitutional law - for what promises to be a bruising Senate confirmation battle.

With an announcement expected Sunday or Monday, administration officials have narrowed the focus to Judges Samuel Alito of New Jersey and Michael Luttig of Virginia, sources involved in the process said. Both have sterling legal qualifications and solid conservative credentials.



Both good choices IMO if this is true.

Text
 

eits

Lifer
Jun 4, 2005
25,015
3
81
www.integratedssr.com
GOOD! that decreped-ass newb.... i'm glad her unqualified-ass resigned. it's time for bush to quit fvcking around and at the very least start giving the retards that voted him in something about which to be proud.