• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Harmonix: Activision Blocked Rock Band PS3 Guitar Compatibility Patch #1

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Originally posted by: warcrow
Wii Sports! All the alpha moms/soccer moms love it! 😉

The Wii is not selling phenominally well just because of the price. It's certainly one of the major reasons, sure, but not the only reason for it's success.

But, I think ducci is right about consumers purchasing one rythm game. I think the people who're interested in one are going to gravitate towards RB more and more, not GH. It might take 6-12 months for the word to get out and fror production to ramp up, but I think it's going to happen. Come Q1 2008, you will be able to buy RB a la cart, and that's going to spawn even more business for Harmonix/EA/MTV.

Plus, as a side note, I think the RB playlist is the best of the bunch.

Oh no it's agreed the Wii is more than just price. But if price was equal, it'd get slaughtered. I've played it and think it's fun, just not my cup of tea.

In regards to buying one rhythm game - every person I know whose a GH fan thinks RB is cool as hell, but is ansy about dropping $190 after tax on a game and a bunch of controllers. $100 is reasonable, but unless you just have an enormous amount of cash to blow, it's hard for my buddies to say "oh without a fvcking doubt I gotta have it, I don't care how much it costs for RB". From a consumer's perspective, price does play a difference, especially when Jill Mom goes into BB and sees GH3 at $99 vs RB at $169. From an actual gamer's POV who buys it themselves, you're right. But the casual gamer or the person who buys it as a gift is going to be price conscious.
 
Originally posted by: ducci
Originally posted by: CKDragon
Originally posted by: Injury
Originally posted by: bl4ckfl4g
Originally posted by: Injury
I can tell you EXACTLY why they did it.

Go to any game store. See how they have plenty of copies of the GH3 Bundle for PS3 but none for the other systems? They need to move them.

Having their guitar work with Rockband would help them move them.....

No, because Rock Band is seen as a competitor to Guitar Hero. People see the one that costs less and they're more likely to go for it.

I disagree strongly with your conclusion.

Due to the fact that there are no individual Rock Band guitars available until 2008, right now MANY Rock Band owners on both the PS3 and 360 are inclined to pick up GH3 for the extra guitar.

The PS3 version of GH3 is oversupplied at many stores while the 360 version is almost nowhere to be found. While the user base totals may have something to do with it, the PS3's neutered compatibility is certainly not helping. How many PS3 Rock Band owners (who apparently have the money to throw down $170 on one game) are out there are annoyed that they cannot play 4-player because there is no option for getting a bass guitar other than spending another $170? Hell, Activision pulling this crap is probably causing some people with more money than brains to buy a 2nd ROCK BAND just for the guitar! Geniuses at work over at Activision.

Your logic is flawed.

You are saying everyone is buying Rock Band, and because of this, they will buy Guitar Hero.

I'm not sure where you got that, but that's definitely NOT what I'm saying. I'm saying that PS3 owners who DO own Rock Band will most likely want a 2nd guitar. The most logical way for those people to get a 2nd guitar would be to buy a GH game that has a guitar included. Activision is losing a sale to these people.

There is no 1-1 correlation of PS3 owners and Rock Band owners, in fact I would assume it's not even close.

In the holiday season, many people only buy 1 item - and the $99 price tag of GH3 looks more appealing than the $170 entry cost of Rock Band.

Yes, I agree. But making the GH3 guitar more compatible has nothing to do with this. People who can only afford one will only afford one, regardless if it's Rock Band or GH3. If people choose to only buy Rock Band, what does it matter what the GH3 guitar can do? If people only buy GH3, what does it matter if the GH3 can't play any other games?

Really, having the GH guitars work with RB would be more of a gift from Activision - but why would they encourage sales of a competitor's product - especially one which is arguably superior?

Activision would be encouraging the owners of a competitor's product (Rock Band) to buy more of their own (GH3) by making their GH3 compatible with it.

A gift? There's no reason for average Joe Customer to think that the guitars WON'T work together. This is such a mind-numbing PR move by Activision that my money is on them changing their mind, if not before Christmas, then right after Christmas morning when little Johnny tells his parents that the $170+$90 fake, plastic guitars they just bought him won't play nice with each other so him and his brother are going to fight about who plays when. 😛
 
Originally posted by: R Nilla
Originally posted by: warcrow
Come Q1 2008, you will be able to buy RB a la cart, and that's going to spawn even more business for Harmonix/EA/MTV.

You already can buy Rock Band a la carte. Of course, the instruments can't be purchased separately until next year...

I dont understand what you're saying. Parts, sold seperatly, arnt available until the end of January.
 
I actually can't believe Sony and MS didn't make controller standards so that these companies can't gouge us.

I do aplaud Harmonix though. THey said they will work with any developer and 3rd party controller manufacturers to help them make compatible controllers, or to make the RB periphs work with their game.
 
Originally posted by: bl4ckfl4g
I actually can't believe Sony and MS didn't make controller standards so that these companies can't gouge us.

I do aplaud Harmonix though. THey said they will work with any developer and 3rd party controller manufacturers to help them make compatible controllers, or to make the RB periphs work with their game.

They do have controller standards - the lack of compatibility is within the software, not the hardware.

I'm not sure where you got that, but that's definitely NOT what I'm saying. I'm saying that PS3 owners who DO own Rock Band will most likely want a 2nd guitar. The most logical way for those people to get a 2nd guitar would be to buy a GH game that has a guitar included. Activision is losing a sale to these people.

Here is my (almost) completely baseless argument:

The majority of those who currently own Rock Band already own a Guitar Hero game. The fact that GH3 was released a month earlier than RB is a huge reason for this. That, and the fact that GH2 has already sold millions.

The PS3 is the weakest market for the Guitar Hero franchise - look at the sales numbers.

Your argument is essentially new customers who are buying Rock Band first are more inclined to also buy Guitar Hero for the extra guitar since no other guitars are available.

My argument is those looking to buy Rock Band are those who are consciously going out looking for it - and those who already own Guitar Hero. Having the guitars work with Rock Band is more motivation to buy Rock Band than to buy Guitar Hero (since as I've said, the majority of customers already own it).

And now that both are out - since Guitar Hero has the cheaper entrance cost - they are in a position to push their own sales further without encouraging growth of a superior competitor.
 
I was under the impression that the GH3 guitars already worked with Rock Band, it mentioned this in every review I read. Am I missing something?
 
Originally posted by: Kev
I was under the impression that the GH3 guitars already worked with Rock Band, it mentioned this in every review I read. Am I missing something?

Only for the 360. PS3 owners are screwed in that regard.
 
Originally posted by: warcrow
Originally posted by: R Nilla
Originally posted by: warcrow
Come Q1 2008, you will be able to buy RB a la cart, and that's going to spawn even more business for Harmonix/EA/MTV.

You already can buy Rock Band a la carte. Of course, the instruments can't be purchased separately until next year...

I dont understand what you're saying. Parts, sold seperatly, arnt available until the end of January.

Maybe I'm misusing "a la carte", but you can buy just the game, without having to buy the $190 bundle. I would consider that "a la carte" with regards to the bundle, since the game is a part of the bundle. It can be purchased right now. As you've said, the instruments cannot be purchased separately until next year, but the game can.
 
I have a PS3 and got screwed by this... I have both games and was hoping for the patch so I could have a bass guitar on Rockband and hopefully an extra guitar for GH3 someday.


I hvae every GH made so far, but unless Activision changes, I won't buy another one. They messed up big time with PS3. First they make a crappy port that has lag problems for everything, now they stop RB from having compatibility with their guitar.

I'm not buying another GH unless they change their minds and allow RB to use their guitars.
 
Originally posted by: R Nilla
Originally posted by: warcrow
Originally posted by: R Nilla
Originally posted by: warcrow
Come Q1 2008, you will be able to buy RB a la cart, and that's going to spawn even more business for Harmonix/EA/MTV.

You already can buy Rock Band a la carte. Of course, the instruments can't be purchased separately until next year...

I dont understand what you're saying. Parts, sold seperatly, arnt available until the end of January.

Maybe I'm misusing "a la carte", but you can buy just the game, without having to buy the $190 bundle. I would consider that "a la carte" with regards to the bundle, since the game is a part of the bundle. It can be purchased right now. As you've said, the instruments cannot be purchased separately until next year, but the game can.

I still dont understand where you're going with this. If you guy the game, how are you going to play it sans equipment?

 
"They do have controller standards - the lack of compatibility is within the software, not the hardware."


Right, but obviously what i'm saying is that as part of the standards, they need to make it so that all of these controllers will work. That is all these controllers are...a controller in the shape of a guitar. Sony and MS(maybe MS already does this) need to make it mandatory that controller peripherals work cross game.
 
Originally posted by: warcrow
Originally posted by: R Nilla
Originally posted by: warcrow
Originally posted by: R Nilla
Originally posted by: warcrow
Come Q1 2008, you will be able to buy RB a la cart, and that's going to spawn even more business for Harmonix/EA/MTV.

You already can buy Rock Band a la carte. Of course, the instruments can't be purchased separately until next year...

I dont understand what you're saying. Parts, sold seperatly, arnt available until the end of January.

Maybe I'm misusing "a la carte", but you can buy just the game, without having to buy the $190 bundle. I would consider that "a la carte" with regards to the bundle, since the game is a part of the bundle. It can be purchased right now. As you've said, the instruments cannot be purchased separately until next year, but the game can.

I still dont understand where you're going with this. If you guy the game, how are you going to play it sans equipment?

I'm not going anywhere, just pointing out that the game itself is currently available a la carte. I think you're trying to read too much into my post. 🙂

And actually this is relevant to your topic since if GH guitars would work you could just buy the standalone game if you only wanted to play the guitar (and bass) parts for now. Do other mics work or do you have to use Rock Band's?
 
Any USB mic works with Rock Band.

Also, I don't get why people are so uppity about this all - Activision has always been defensive with their GH hardware - look at how they closed off all 3rd-party guitars for GH2.
 
Originally posted by: bl4ckfl4g
"They do have controller standards - the lack of compatibility is within the software, not the hardware."


Right, but obviously what i'm saying is that as part of the standards, they need to make it so that all of these controllers will work. That is all these controllers are...a controller in the shape of a guitar. Sony and MS(maybe MS already does this) need to make it mandatory that controller peripherals work cross game.

Microsoft HAS the standards. Thus GH/RB guitar compatibility. Ps3 does NOT
 
After reading this Text article I have to say I am a little pissed off at Activision. In my opinion this is a bad move on Activision?s part. I have sent an email to the following people at Activision. If anyone else shares my feeling about these issues please send an email to the following people and hopefully we can get this patch released.

Robert Kotick, Chairman of the board and CEO bkotick@activision.com
Brian Kelly, Co Chairman and Director bkelly@activision.com
Ronald Doornick, Director and Senior advisor rdoornink@activision.com
Michael Griffith, President and CEO mgriffith@activision.com
Thomas Tippl, CFO ttippl@activision.com
George Rose, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary grose@activision.com
Robin Kaminsky, Executive Vise President Publishing rkaminsky@activision.com
Brian Hodous, Chief Customer Officer bhodous@activision.com
Ann Weiser Chief Human resources Officer aweiser@activision.com

Yes basically I just sent am email to everyone on their Executive Team list. I tried support first but just got a canned response saying they had no information on a PS3 patch.
 
Originally posted by: drlucky
After reading this Text article I have to say I am a little pissed off at Activision. In my opinion this is a bad move on Activision?s part. I have sent an email to the following people at Activision. If anyone else shares my feeling about these issues please send an email to the following people and hopefully we can get this patch released.

Robert Kotick, Chairman of the board and CEO bkotick@activision.com
Brian Kelly, Co Chairman and Director bkelly@activision.com
Ronald Doornick, Director and Senior advisor rdoornink@activision.com
Michael Griffith, President and CEO mgriffith@activision.com
Thomas Tippl, CFO ttippl@activision.com
George Rose, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary grose@activision.com
Robin Kaminsky, Executive Vise President Publishing rkaminsky@activision.com
Brian Hodous, Chief Customer Officer bhodous@activision.com
Ann Weiser Chief Human resources Officer aweiser@activision.com

Yes basically I just sent am email to everyone on their Executive Team list. I tried support first but just got a canned response saying they had no information on a PS3 patch.

And not a single one of these guys are going to care.
 
Originally posted by: RagingBITCH
Originally posted by: drlucky
After reading this Text article I have to say I am a little pissed off at Activision. In my opinion this is a bad move on Activision?s part. I have sent an email to the following people at Activision. If anyone else shares my feeling about these issues please send an email to the following people and hopefully we can get this patch released.

Robert Kotick, Chairman of the board and CEO bkotick@activision.com
Brian Kelly, Co Chairman and Director bkelly@activision.com
Ronald Doornick, Director and Senior advisor rdoornink@activision.com
Michael Griffith, President and CEO mgriffith@activision.com
Thomas Tippl, CFO ttippl@activision.com
George Rose, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary grose@activision.com
Robin Kaminsky, Executive Vise President Publishing rkaminsky@activision.com
Brian Hodous, Chief Customer Officer bhodous@activision.com
Ann Weiser Chief Human resources Officer aweiser@activision.com

Yes basically I just sent am email to everyone on their Executive Team list. I tried support first but just got a canned response saying they had no information on a PS3 patch.

And not a single one of these guys are going to care.

And a distributed mail bomb is as good as extortion. :thumbsdown: I don't like what they're doing, but this is a lame way to go about it.
 
Originally posted by: drlucky
After reading this Text article I have to say I am a little pissed off at Activision. In my opinion this is a bad move on Activision?s part. I have sent an email to the following people at Activision. If anyone else shares my feeling about these issues please send an email to the following people and hopefully we can get this patch released.

Robert Kotick, Chairman of the board and CEO bkotick@activision.com
Brian Kelly, Co Chairman and Director bkelly@activision.com
Ronald Doornick, Director and Senior advisor rdoornink@activision.com
Michael Griffith, President and CEO mgriffith@activision.com
Thomas Tippl, CFO ttippl@activision.com
George Rose, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary grose@activision.com
Robin Kaminsky, Executive Vise President Publishing rkaminsky@activision.com
Brian Hodous, Chief Customer Officer bhodous@activision.com
Ann Weiser Chief Human resources Officer aweiser@activision.com

Yes basically I just sent am email to everyone on their Executive Team list. I tried support first but just got a canned response saying they had no information on a PS3 patch.


That's basically pointless and not going to do a thing except annoy people. If you really want to be heard, there are other, more productive ways to go about it. Maybe start a petition?
 
12/20/07

Well, that solves the riddle. Activision has simply come out and said what's holding up the PS3 guitar patch that will allow Guitar Hero and Rock Band guitars to work with each other. The Boston Globe quotes Activision spokeswoman: "We believe we should be compensated for the use of our technology." Well, that's blunt.

We still don't understand what Activision has to lose by making the guitars compatible with each other. With so many Rock Band players desperate for another guitar controller, we're pretty sure they'll give Activision the sweet cash they're looking for by buying the game. Isn't that free money for them?

Source:http://www.ps3fanboy.com/2007/...-for-ps3-guitar-patch/
 
Sounds like a corporate case of sour grapes. As for the 360, I think its a case of the genie already being out of the bottle. There is no way to put it back short of getting a court order for harmonex to patch & break compatibility.


Would be a shame if sony let that patch leak out in an nice easily downloadable iso update. :evil:
 
Originally posted by: ObscureCaucasian
Is it possible that Microsoft paid for the compatibility before the game shipped?


No, I think the issue was that MS required the guitars to just be recognized as controllers.
 
Originally posted by: warcrow
That's basically pointless and not going to do a thing except annoy people. If you really want to be heard, there are other, more productive ways to go about it. Maybe start a petition?

Are you serious? I actually laughed when I read this. Starting an online petition is productive? First I've heard of that. Emailing executives within the company will be MUCH more productive than a couple thousand "signatures" on an online petition.
 
Originally posted by: bl4ckfl4g
Originally posted by: ObscureCaucasian
Is it possible that Microsoft paid for the compatibility before the game shipped?


No, I think the issue was that MS required the guitars to just be recognized as controllers.

more or less yeah
 
Back
Top