Seriously thier site is down for me ATM..:Q
Originally posted by: Zebo
Maybe they already been injuncted
anyway here's techreport talking about it
http://techreport.com/onearticle.x/6373
"KB Networks has spent approximately $150,000 on litigation fighting over jurisdiction. On the very deadline to produce Court Ordered documents, Infinium Labs waived previously asserted objections to jurisdiction in hopes of avoiding production of the documents. Our attorneys believe Infinium Labs never had any basis for alleging they were not subject to jurisdiction in Texas, that KB Networks is entitled to the documents, and that the subject documents will likely include evidence of investor fraud, SEC violations, and that Timothy Roberts is the alter ego of Infinium Labs. "
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: Zebo
Maybe they already been injuncted
anyway here's techreport talking about it
http://techreport.com/onearticle.x/6373
"KB Networks has spent approximately $150,000 on litigation fighting over jurisdiction. On the very deadline to produce Court Ordered documents, Infinium Labs waived previously asserted objections to jurisdiction in hopes of avoiding production of the documents. Our attorneys believe Infinium Labs never had any basis for alleging they were not subject to jurisdiction in Texas, that KB Networks is entitled to the documents, and that the subject documents will likely include evidence of investor fraud, SEC violations, and that Timothy Roberts is the alter ego of Infinium Labs. "
ii saw their link to techreport . . . . and read VERY carefully EVERYTHING on the index page . . . . Nuthin' on the original comments that inspired FM's thread.
The site is very slow loading and i think whatever kyle said is probably taken down (HardOCP has lawyers, also)
are you replying to me?Originally posted by: Zebo
Originally posted by: apoppin
Originally posted by: Zebo
Maybe they already been injuncted
anyway here's techreport talking about it
http://techreport.com/onearticle.x/6373
"KB Networks has spent approximately $150,000 on litigation fighting over jurisdiction. On the very deadline to produce Court Ordered documents, Infinium Labs waived previously asserted objections to jurisdiction in hopes of avoiding production of the documents. Our attorneys believe Infinium Labs never had any basis for alleging they were not subject to jurisdiction in Texas, that KB Networks is entitled to the documents, and that the subject documents will likely include evidence of investor fraud, SEC violations, and that Timothy Roberts is the alter ego of Infinium Labs. "
ii saw their link to techreport . . . . and read VERY carefully EVERYTHING on the index page . . . . Nuthin' on the original comments that inspired FM's thread.
The site is very slow loading and i think whatever kyle said is probably taken down (HardOCP has lawyers, also)
Is this english?
Guys asked me for proof KB has spent over 100K just defending one slapp suit. I provided it..
Here's the direct link to KB's site
http://www.hardocp.com/article.html?art=Njcx
Quote:
KB Networks has spent approximately $150,000 on litigation fighting over jurisdiction. On the very deadline to produce Court Ordered documents, Infinium Labs waived previously asserted objections to jurisdiction in hopes of avoiding production of the documents. Our attorneys believe Infinium Labs never had any basis for alleging they were not subject to jurisdiction in Texas, that KB Networks is entitled to the documents, and that the subject documents will likely include evidence of investor fraud, SEC violations, and that Timothy Roberts is the alter ego of Infinium Labs.
Monday, October 4, 2004
Date
Miscellaneous
Categories
Infinium Labs
Manufacturers
Kyle Bennett
Author
Below you will find the body of the motion as our attorneys at the law firm of Storm and Hemingway filed it with the U.S. Federal Court here in Dallas, TX.
Should you wish to see the entire document with all of the supporting evidence, you can download the zipped PDF here.
You are correct in that you might not get arrested for saying someone sucks. Therefore it is not illegal. BUT, if by saying someone sucks does them harm, and it can be shown that they in fact do not suck, your butt can be monetarily responsible for their loses because of your actions. Actions have consequences. You can get arrested for saying someone sucks and there is a court order that says you cannot say that anymore (because you said it before and they proved in a court of law that you were doing them harm and will continue to do them harm without protection from the courts).
I don't know if FM is threatening to sue over (just) the original editorial, but here it is. I also haven't been to H in a while, and don't know what they've written about 3DM05, but considering Tero's email to Kyle included a pic of H's front page, I'd imagine his front page posts are a big source of FM's consternation.
Facebook
Twitter