• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Harddrive performance diff 8mb cache VS 2mb

Im just curious as seeing a bunch of the 8mb cache drives vs the 2mb drives what the diff would be. I mean I dont need the absolute top of the line. I just want a good drive. Im looking at some of the Samsung drives as Ive heard they are super quiet.
 
The only place I have a drive with 8 MB buffer is my laptop. It also has a 2 MB buffered drive - same rpm (5400) and same size. When cloning one to the other, when the 8 MB Toshiba is writing, it is faster by about 2 minutes for the whole job. There is an increase in performance, but I can't tell you a ratio or rate.
 
search "2mb" (recent and archived) for a bunch of opinions.

IMHO not much difference in real-world applications but worth $5.
 
I've found it to be a pretty subtle difference. When the 8MB drives first hit the market, people made it sound as though they would transform your machine - they won't. Still probably worthwhile if it is only slightly costlier.
 
Originally posted by: JimRaynor
I think you would be hard pressesd to tell a difference.
When you've got PCs with no major differences but the HD, you can. But generally...no. Hence my buying a 2MB drive to save a bit of $.
 
For me, I went with a 2MB because the single platter Samsungs (which are supposed to be even quieter than the multi-platter drives) are 2MB.
 
Back
Top