Pretty fail no MSAA at 1600p.
LOL @ conclusion: "It is the GPU overclock that provides the most performance on Radeon HD 7950 and it takes near 1.2GHz for the Radeon HD 7950 to shine in this comparison. Unless you have a high-end custom video card with voltage control and great cooling, you won't be able to get the HD 7950 up to these clock levels most likely. We've had some poor overclocks on HD 7950 cards in the past, so it takes a video card with enthusiast performance in mind to get this level of gameplay. Our HD 7950 overclock represents pretty much the best performance you can get out of a custom built Radeon HD 7950 and we just want everyone to be clear on this."
Farking pure fail there [H].
You didn't even reach 1.2ghz on the core and you think its the "best performance you can get out of a custom built Radeon HD 7950"? Clue, 1.2ghz is the ~average from forum posts at oc.net and even [H] has a thread on the OC potential.
"In the end, we were surprised how well the GALAXY GTX 660 Ti GC overclock holds up to these two custom video cards overclock. More often than not the GALAXY GTX 660 Ti GC overclock performance was within 10% of the performance of the overclocked GTX 670! So despite the 192-bit memory bus, the high near 1.3GHz frequency we got on the GALAXY video card plus the memory overclock of 7.6GHz brought performance up to almost the same as the GTX 670 overclocked."
A huge vram OC on the 660ti obviously negates the lower bus, compared to the 670. And its 10% without AA at 1600p, and with 4x AA at 1080p. With 8xAA at 1080p, the gap is more like 20-25% according to heaps of other reviews.
[H], so fail of late. What happened to you guys?