Noobtastic
Banned
- Jul 9, 2005
- 3,721
- 0
- 0
Right. Try reading your own link next time:
Does Hamas take steps to avoid civilian casualties at all? No. In fact it delierately targets them.
So not only was the use of cluster bombs in contravention of orders NOT to use them, but the IDF conducted an inquiry to see if a court martial was in order. Why? Because the IDF recognized that cluster bombs put civilians at unnecessary risk. Does Hamas have such moral limitations? No. They use any means at their disposal to DELIBERATELY put civilians at risk.
Summing up, you have proven condition 1. You haven't proven condition 2 (it occurred against orders to the contrary), condition 3 (while it negligently harmed civilians, the attack was targeting the site of a rocket launch, which Israel's enemies deliberately plant in populated areas for the inevitable PR nightmare to follow), or condition 4 (this happened 4 years ago.)
Try again.
you don't get it - israel is always wrong.
what, hamas deliberately installs rocket launchers near civilian areas to deter attack?
no, that doesn't phase flavio.
what, hamas dresses up as civilians to fool israeli soldiers, and putting legitimate civilians lives at risk?
no, flavio isn't bothered by those sorts of things.
what, hamas hijacks international red cross vehicles and uses them for an attack?
etc...etc...etc..
there is nothing outrageous about israel's code of conduct.
in fact, in compares rather favorably...to....well, everyone else.
perhaps if we treated our enemies like israel we wouldn't be killing 10,000 annually.