Halo PC has gone GOLD!

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

sman789

Banned
May 6, 2003
1,038
0
0
Originally posted by: brigden
The game runs like crap, the lo-res textures look like crap, and the gameplay isn't even that enjoyable. I've always wanted to play the game after hearing people rave about it for so long.

I played the PC version today. The retail version. It sucks.

yup, flt released last night

suxors
 

Maleficus

Diamond Member
May 2, 2001
7,682
0
0
Originally posted by: uncJIGGA
some people are now saying the FLT release is NOT the final gold version.

prolly not the best place to discuss this but yea thats what people are saying. seems both founded and unfounded.
 

clicknext

Banned
Mar 27, 2002
3,884
0
0
Originally posted by: brigden
The game runs like crap, the lo-res textures look like crap, and the gameplay isn't even that enjoyable. I've always wanted to play the game after hearing people rave about it for so long.

I played the PC version today. The retail version. It sucks.

Bastard, how did you get your grubby little hands on it? ;)
 

Lager

Diamond Member
May 19, 2003
9,433
0
0
Where did you guys already get your copy? I thought it wasn't released until 30th?
 

0roo0roo

No Lifer
Sep 21, 2002
64,795
84
91
so much for all that talk of halo being easy to convert to pc... ;) all those people who said they'd just wait for the pc version scoffing the xbox... 0wned ;)
 

Maleficus

Diamond Member
May 2, 2001
7,682
0
0
Originally posted by: bunker
Originally posted by: Maleficus
Originally posted by: uncJIGGA
some people are now saying the FLT release is NOT the final gold version.

prolly not the best place to discuss this but yea thats what people are saying. seems both founded and unfounded.

I don't see why it wouldn't be the Gold version.
Check the version number

Thats it.

Yours run like crap?
 

NorthRiver

Golden Member
May 6, 2002
1,457
0
0
It is really choppy at 1600x1200. I had to reduse it to 1280x1024. It runs alright now. Looks okay, but I already beat it on XBOX.

Specs.
2500 Barton @ 2.2G
768 Ram
Audigy
XP PRO
9700 Pro
 

batmang

Diamond Member
Jul 16, 2003
3,020
1
81
Originally posted by: NorthRiver
It is really choppy at 1600x1200. I had to reduse it to 1280x1024. It runs alright now. Looks okay, but I already beat it on XBOX.

Specs.
2500 Barton @ 2.2G
768 Ram
Audigy
XP PRO
9700 Pro

...... wtf do u expect, 1600x1200.... idiots man, IDIOTS
 

clicknext

Banned
Mar 27, 2002
3,884
0
0
Originally posted by: batmang
Originally posted by: NorthRiver
It is really choppy at 1600x1200. I had to reduse it to 1280x1024. It runs alright now. Looks okay, but I already beat it on XBOX.

Specs.
2500 Barton @ 2.2G
768 Ram
Audigy
XP PRO
9700 Pro

...... wtf do u expect, 1600x1200.... idiots man, IDIOTS
Well, for that system, I don't think 1600x1200 is too unreasonable. However, as has been said about a million times, don't judge the performance unless you have the final version.