"Half of Europe under Stalin vs. all of Europe under Hitler"?

[Anarchist420]

Why do so many think Stalin, Churchill, and FDR did Europe a favor?

Why do they assume that it would easier to leave one Europe than one with a wall half way between it?

Smith 1932 would've been a win for all... if Al Smith had defeated FDR's sorry ass, then there would've been no Cold War, no continuation of WWI, no New Deal, no JFK, no CRA 1964, no Holocaust, no Jewish refugees getting turned down, no divided Europe, and no Japanese civilians getting murdered by U.S. forces.

 

[Atreus21]

No holocaust? Japanese civilians murdered?

WTF are you talking ab-oh what's the use.

 

[Anarchist420]

No holocaust? Japanese civilians murdered?

Those were the Allied powers' fault weren't they?

The Allied powers were the ones who aggressed against humanity and enabled the Axis powers to do so.

If Churchill had just let the Jews in to Britain as refugees, then they could've even sold their property and taken their valuables with them. Instead, Churchill chose to fight Germany again and we got a Cold War.

 

[NTMBK]

 

[Genx87]

Those were the Allied powers' fault weren't they?

The Allied powers were the ones who aggressed against humanity and enabled the Axis powers to do so.

If Churchill had just let the Jews in to Britain as refugees, then they could've even sold their property and taken their valuables with them. Instead, Churchill chose to fight Germany again and we got a Cold War.

Your view of history is odd. Germany was set to expand east. But to do so needed to crush France and force Britain into begging for its life and signing an alliance.

While I agree we left half of europe high and dry after the war. But the idea if Churchill allowed Jews into Britain war wouldnt have happened is silly.

 

[Exterous]

Smith 1932 would've been a win for all... if Al Smith had defeated FDR's sorry ass, then there would've been no Cold War, no continuation of WWI, no New Deal, no JFK, no CRA 1964, no Holocaust, no Jewish refugees getting turned down, no divided Europe, and no Japanese civilians getting murdered by U.S. forces.

Wait...what? If Al Smith had won there would have been no Holocaust? How do you figure that? We would also have a lot more murdered Chinese

 

[JEDIYoda]

Isn`t Al Smith a Chef on the food network.......oops my bad..thats Art Smith.....

 

[ichy]

Those were the Allied powers' fault weren't they?

The Allied powers were the ones who aggressed against humanity and enabled the Axis powers to do so.

It blows my mind that your ignorant, trolling and now Nazi-apologist ass hasn't been banned from this forum. I hope that your parents cut off the internet access to their basement so you stop bothering the world with your braindead horseshit.

 

[Gerle]

no Japanese civilians getting murdered by U.S. forces.

Japan had been expanding in Asia for decades by that point, well prior to any US oil and metal embargoes.
Nanking?

 

[waggy]

wow..

 

[JEDIYoda]

wow..

just wow....

 

[JEDIYoda]

I bet the Op speaks German.....

 

[waggy]

I bet the Op speaks German.....

nothing wrong with that. Hell my family came from Germany after WWI and right Before WWII. my grandparents still speak German.

but the ops thoughts..

wow is pretty much all i can say that won't get me banned.

 

[Matt1970]

Like I said in your last one, have you ever started a thread that wasn't a train wreck?

 

[theevilsharpie]

Smith 1932 would've been a win for all... if Al Smith had defeated FDR's sorry ass, then there would've been no Cold War, no continuation of WWI, no New Deal, no JFK, no CRA 1964, no Holocaust, no Jewish refugees getting turned down, no divided Europe, and no Japanese civilians getting murdered by U.S. forces.

Please stop posting.

 

[Anarchist420]

[...]Nazi-apologist[...]

I fail to see how I am a nazi apologist when I just hate churchill and FDR and when I wanted Hitler and Stalin to be left solely to their own devices... see Ralph Raico on the matter. He's not an anti-semite, but FDR was. FDR was an Egyptapologist (FDR wanted to take Egypt's side rather than remain neutral in the middle east conflict) and Churchill was a terrible social nationalist... he mass murdered to suppress India's independence, he started an embargo that starved hundreds of thousands of innocent german civilians and he was a neoconservative.

 

[Pr0d1gy]

 

[sm625]

Forget Al Smith. Read about The White House Putsch (1933). If that had succeeded things would have turned out mighty differently indeed. Nowadays every candidate is a bankster stooge like Bush and Obama.

 

[diesbudt]

....

Right, somehow our presidental choice helped influence Hitler into making concentration camps and killing millions of people of a singular faith.

Congrats, OP. You are now leading the pack in being the first into me ignoring someone.

 

[JockoJohnson]

....

Right, somehow our presidental choice helped influence Hitler into making concentration camps and killing millions of people of a singular faith.

Congrats, OP. You are now leading the pack in being the first into me ignoring someone.

Agreed. I did the same here. At least Spidey, Ausm, Phokus, Incorruptible, DCal, and a few other nimrods offer some entertainment. This guy offers nothing.