yhelothar
Lifer
- Dec 11, 2002
- 18,409
- 39
- 91
Originally posted by: bobsmith1492
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: bobsmith1492
Originally posted by: 91TTZ
Originally posted by: bobsmith1492
Originally posted by: NanoStuff
If it functions the same way, what makes you presume it isn't alive in the same way?Originally posted by: Eli
even though it isn't "alive".. it functions the same way.
You're right though, it's probably not alive to any distinguishable degree, it doesn't have the necessary structure. If it did however, it would be.
You have to be able to reproduce yourself to be considered alive, hence a thinking computer would not be.
So an infertile person is not alive?
No, they as a species are able to reproduce. They have the capability, it just isn't working right in that particular individual.
What if you had a factory that made industrial robots? You make the industrial robots with the same kind of robot you're producing. Are those robots alive?
That's not the only condition... bleeshers, bio was back in high school - don't strain my memory!![]()
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Life
But then again, those traits of life are pretty much arbitrarily defined by those in the bio field who felt what life should mean.
It's all a matter of semantics.
