Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.
I have to admit, I had to analyze the comment four times before I got the joke. I never would have gone back to re-analyze if it weren't for CallMeJoe. I think it was the 'I can't believe anyone hasn't addressed this:' part that threw me off. I'm still not entirely convinced. :hmm:
It seems that he was referring to the people already released with that statement, and not necessarily the murderers. Not that that makes the situation much better.
Yeah, his statement is still asinine for at least two reasons:
1) People that were already released are banned from holding certain licenses, voting, owning guns, etc for a reason. If someone commits a crime of confidence they're not supposed to be able to get a securities license and commit another confidence crime.
2) A pardon does not discriminate. In other words, pardons are unconditional. If you pardon a attorney so that he can hunt the same condition (being able to own guns and hunt) applies to all people pardoned, even those such as the murderers. Barbour cannot say "I pardon you so you can hunt and you so you can get a license, etc"; it's a blanket power that expunges everything for everyone.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.