- Sep 26, 2000
- 28,559
- 4
- 0
http://www.popsci.com/technology/ar...ttoos-could-protect-implanted-devices-hackers
Tattooing Patients With UV Ink Could Protect Pacemakers From Hackers
More and more implantable devices, like pacemakers or defibrillators, are turning to wireless signals as a means to communicate with external devices, but in doing so they open themselves to security breaches. Several solutions are in the works that tackle this problem by upping device defenses, but by piling on security measures, yet another risk emerges: that at a critical time an authorized physician might not be able to access the device.
So Microsoft Research proposes putting a new technological spin on an old, time-tested security protocol: protect every device with a password, then tattoo the password right onto the patient in invisible UV ink.
Ok, first off, WTF???
We really are a sick society.
I mean, could someone hijack your pacemaker and demand payment or else they'll turn it off?
Oh, and did I mention, WTF????
Tattooing Patients With UV Ink Could Protect Pacemakers From Hackers
More and more implantable devices, like pacemakers or defibrillators, are turning to wireless signals as a means to communicate with external devices, but in doing so they open themselves to security breaches. Several solutions are in the works that tackle this problem by upping device defenses, but by piling on security measures, yet another risk emerges: that at a critical time an authorized physician might not be able to access the device.
So Microsoft Research proposes putting a new technological spin on an old, time-tested security protocol: protect every device with a password, then tattoo the password right onto the patient in invisible UV ink.
Ok, first off, WTF???
We really are a sick society.
I mean, could someone hijack your pacemaker and demand payment or else they'll turn it off?
Oh, and did I mention, WTF????