• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Hackers hit the motherload A-D list celebs nudes

Page 4 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
ok, I d/l the ~150 pics.

now need someone to match names to the pics 😛

the only one I recognized was JLaw
 
Don't care if you look, but do keep in mind that the age of consent may be ~16 in certain areas with a bunch of asterisks(e.g. you need to be 18 to do porn).

Key point: Watch out for underage issues. Some of those people listed are barely over 18. You have no idea when they were taken. Depending on how paranoid you are about the FBI... Good luck.
 
Imp said:
Don't care if you look, but do keep in mind that the age of consent may be ~16 in certain areas with a bunch of asterisks(e.g. you need to be 18 to do porn).

Key point: Watch out for underage issues. Some of those people listed are barely over 18. You have no idea when they were taken. Depending on how paranoid you are about the FBI... Good luck.
Click to expand...

Good point. Outside of JLaw, Kate Upton, Bar Raefeli, and a couple others, i have no idea who these people are. I guess i don't generally give a shit about celebrities.
 
McKayla Maroney is in there and she is just 18, quick skimming and googleing of names i had at least heard or has her at the youngest
 
lol.. selena gomez in see thru bathing suit.

whats the point?!

yes, u can see everything, including lips
 
a certain subreddit has Jennifer Lawrence / Kate Upton pics

Justin Verlander might possibly be cheating on Kate Upton
 
If these (which sounds like most are) are legit, too bad the focus will be more around the bad hacker and not the real issue that led to this which is the insistence on everything being connected and "clouded" etc. These people (for the most part) have no clue how their devices work or what they really do, neither do most people. This is also why Facebook is still so popular even after it's shown time and again what you do on Facebook gets you busted. People are stupid. Get rid of your smartphone if you want privacy, otherwise, you better go back to polaroids 😛
 
Last edited:
Imp said:
Tabloid sites say that the guy who has them is releasing them slowly... Might be trying to sell them.
Click to expand...

How would that work, exactly? If people figure out who he is won't he be in legal trouble? So that seems like a catch 22, get paid and face law suits/criminal charges, or release them all for free and try to stay anonymous?
 
02ranger said:
How would that work, exactly? If people figure out who he is won't he be in legal trouble? So that seems like a catch 22, get paid and face law suits/criminal charges, or release them all for free and try to stay anonymous?
Click to expand...

He's currently being paid in bitcoin, not sure how the tabloids will be able to pay him though.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top