https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/01/...column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news
Everybody else pays more, obviously.
Everybody else pays more, obviously.
Just to fuck with the ACA especially folk with e preexisting conditions. Lol so pathetic not much to say.
"Everybody will be taken care of" except when they aren't.
Guess who's more likely to have pre-existing conditions... It's the core of Trump's support, people 45-64 & those on medicare.
Thanks for your votes & now it's time for... cornholio, the true meaning of MAGA.
Yeah fancy that a policy expressly designed to exclude pre-existing conditions in order to reduce costs wouldn't be a great deal for people with pre-conditions. Amazing concept that "market segmentation" stuff.
Oh goody, now I can actually have an affordable medical plan that is worse than useless. Yay!!!!https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/01/...column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news
Everybody else pays more, obviously.
We get it, you are an idiot and can't think past the headline. No need to spam every thread now just to make sure everyone knows how dumb you are.
Sure thing. Maybe your side should apply this same line of thinking to every product. "You can only afford a Yugo and not a Mercedes therefore you shouldn't own a car at all."
And I look at others paying more as a feature not a bug since they were being expressly cross-subsidized by the person who is now allowed to buy the cheaper policy not covering pre-existing conditions if they don't get an economic benefit from that policy feature (i.e. they don't have a pre-existing condition).
"Everybody will be taken care of" except when they aren't.
Guess who's more likely to have pre-existing conditions... It's the core of Trump's support, people 45-64 & those on medicare.
Thanks for your votes & now it's time for... cornholio, the true meaning of MAGA.
Sure thing. Maybe your side should apply this same line of thinking to every product. "You can only afford a Yugo and not a Mercedes therefore you shouldn't own a car at all."
And I look at others paying more as a feature not a bug since they were being expressly cross-subsidized by the person who is now allowed to buy the cheaper policy not covering pre-existing conditions if they don't get an economic benefit from that policy feature (i.e. they don't have a pre-existing condition).
Meh, I gots my employer coverage that covers... everything...including my pre-existing conditions.
I do think one of the stupidest things about our system is the concept of "strategizing" healthcare. The concept of "Oh shit, maybe I should see a dermatologist this year for that annoying issue that I've been lazy to see anyone about - because I've reached my deductible, might as well milk it right?"
I agree in the sense that healthcare shouldn't be something you strategize. If you have a problem, you shouldn't even say something like "Better hold off to next year so it falls under the next years deductible" or similar.
You mean death panels? Why do you want to kill grandma?We should focus on preventative care, I’m fine with heavily taxing food with added sugar (but those funds have to be spent on healthcare), people should be allowed to purchase catastrophic coverage, and towards the end of life medicine should be focused on providing dignity in death instead of the keep alive at all cost.
We should focus on preventative care, I’m fine with heavily taxing food with added sugar (but those funds have to be spent on healthcare), people should be allowed to purchase catastrophic coverage, and towards the end of life medicine should be focused on providing dignity in death instead of the keep alive at all cost.
You mean death panels? Why do you want to kill grandma?
Call them whatever you want, the idea that someone should be kept alive no matter what is absurd. Be allowed to die with dignity. Spending $400k to keep grandma alive another month makes zero sense.
You know, I am fine with this, because liberal states will just ban these policies at state level, and conservative states will get what they voted for.
Why should those policies be banned? And what is it the Republicans would be getting other than more choices?
Also forgot a big one, insurance companies should be allowed to sell across state lines. There’s no reason to not let them.
They shouldn't be banned, they have uses, but they should be kept short term (<360 days) s that's what they are intended for.