ShintaiDK
Lifer
- Apr 22, 2012
- 20,378
- 145
- 106
The fog is missing in FXAA:
That's nothing to do as such with FXAA.
The conclusion from the thread you took the screens from is that FXAA is a tad better than MLAA.
Last edited:
The fog is missing in FXAA:
That's nothing to do as such with FXAA.
MLAA and FXAA both suck pretty bad in most actual games I've played. Blurred, smeared textures. In FO4 it was just awful
It is the cheap mans AA that's for sure. Running 4xAA instead of MLAA in Warhammer is a big improvement.
SSAA is super GPU intensive though and it's not really any different from DSR/VSR. If you're already playing at a high resolution, SMAA, FXAA and MLAA can be useful.I tend to go SSAA when ever possible. Every other AA just sucks in comparison.
SSAA is super GPU intensive though and it's not really any different from DSR/VSR. If you're already playing at a high resolution, SMAA, FXAA and MLAA can be useful.
maybe i should pick up another 290 now that people seem to be dumping them :hmm:
CF work in this?
Hm? They only tested 1080p with high/ultra and that's CPU bottlenecked for the high end cards even in ultra settings. The only trends I can reliably pull out of that is that the 380 pulls ahead another ~10% on the 960 and the 390 gains ~10% on the 980. Might be MLAA related, could have other reasons, hard to tell.The strange thing is, they are getting some wild different results than wccftech...
http://wccftech.com/total-war-warhammer-benchmarks-unveiled-invest-powerful-cpu/
The "High" results are actually not bad for Nvidia, except for the GTX1080, for some reason the "Ultra" setting swifts things way too much in favor of AMD.
Hm? They only tested 1080p with high/ultra and that's CPU bottlenecked for the high end cards even in ultra settings. The only trends I can reliably pull out of that is that the 380 pulls ahead another ~10% on the 960 and the 390 gains ~10% on the 980. Might be MLAA related, could have other reasons, hard to tell.
Then what caused it when that was the only option they changed? Posting another unrelated screenshot isn't proof.
Also where is the proof that it hurts Nvidia performance a lot? I showed that it has almost no perf hit.
1080FE doesn't throttle, Polaris is a joke in performance/W, 290X TDP is 250W, DX12 is pointless, etc.
and it is allowed on a serious hardware forumSo any more info on when this patch is coming? Should be this week if they want to keep to their schedule.
C'mon man, why bother actually providing any proof for your claims.
It's way more efficient to just let out a continues stream of unsubstantiated spin and half-truths and simply ignore anyone who calls you out on it.
1080FE doesn't throttle, Polaris is a joke in performance/W, 290X TDP is 250W, DX12 is pointless, etc.