Guns and the United States

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

Ulfwald

Moderator Emeritus<br>Elite Member
May 27, 2000
8,646
0
76
Czar, over hear, I equate socialist with liberals, WHY? because they want government to control everything. So yeah, you are a liberal socialist.

When are you going to face facts man, guns do nothing to people, PEOPLE do things to PEOPLE, so thje problem is not guns, it is people who have no respect for society, its values and morals, and the people who live in it.

Yes, you do have a right to free speech, until it infringes upon my right of free speech as well.
 

Czar

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
28,510
0
0
ulfwald
I´m not stopping you to voice your opinion, just voicing mine. And yes people kill people but people with guns are more likely to kill people.
 

bigvince

Banned
Aug 25, 2000
1,201
0
0
Teatowel


i didnt say GUNcrime i said crime in genneral. if you look at the rise in ALL crime there is an increase. i would say that it is directly realted to the fact that criminals when commiting crimes, no longer have to fear death or serious injury as result of there crime because theres no one to shoot them. furthermore since the cops in your country don't have guns and the criminals do (iliigaly), what's stoping them from running rampant....:Q
 

bigvince

Banned
Aug 25, 2000
1,201
0
0


<< . And yes people kill people but people with guns are more likely to kill people >>



any less than swords or daggers...?:confused:
 

LadyJessica

Senior member
Apr 20, 2000
444
0
0
Right on. And when I want my thermonuclear warhead, why does the government always try and stop me?
 

bigvince

Banned
Aug 25, 2000
1,201
0
0
jessica,


because with that you could blow up a large part of the united states not to mention yourself....:)


with a gun you could only take out 3 or 4 people before your taken down...
 

Czar

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
28,510
0
0
bigvince


<< any less than swords or daggers...? >>


Oh yess, any idiot who can hold a gun can kill someone and that someone can do nothing about it. If someone attacks you with a sword or a dagger you can defend yourself, or just simply run away
 

MustangSVT

Lifer
Oct 7, 2000
11,554
12
81
funny how this incident came on my mind
Rossi O'donnel attacked Tom Celic(spell?) because he was an IRA member. Say stuff like, &quot;How can u support guns? they are Killing children!&quot;. And she was sponsering for K-mart (big sales in guns) and also carreid a little hand gun with her!!! she said, &quot;well, cause im a celebrity and i need protection.&quot;. OMFG! what a fat assed bitch!? what makes her more in need of a gun then a women that lives alone in some ghetto or some high crime area?! . there are lot of BS.

ok so the gun laws will make it harder for regular ppl to get guns while it wont affect criminals getting guns, so they are making us have less protection against crimminals and make us an easier target. Government is taking away our rights little by little in disguise of oh we need to protect the children, children this children that. One day ppl will not stand for it no more..
 

loup garou

Lifer
Feb 17, 2000
35,132
1
81
Holy crap, Tom Selleck is a member of the Irish Republican Army? hehe..j/k, I think you meant to say NRA! :)

That's my comment on this thread...nothing more.
 

thebestMAX

Diamond Member
Sep 14, 2000
7,516
138
106
Rosie O'Donnell (SP) is an idiot. Many of her statements were probably written by Barbra Striesand. Laws dont apply to celebrities, read Democrats. Witness Bore at the debates, rules? What rules?

<<Due to the fact that George Bush is going to get elected, I am now initiating a kindler, gentler me who will no longer comment on political, environmental, gun, martial arts or religious threads, MUCH >>

Note the MUCH