Gun Toting Kindegartener.......

GoldenTiger

Banned
Jan 14, 2001
2,594
0
0
WHY DOES EVERYONE BLAME SOMEONE ELSE FOR A KID'S ACTIONS?! It was the KID that brought guns, NOT the parents...
 

GoldenTiger

Banned
Jan 14, 2001
2,594
0
0
The article's very sketchy anyway... the kid could have found it on a street and thought it was a cool toy; he could have been given it; he could have stolen it; he could have been threatened by some random stranger; who the hell knows! Parents don't mind-control a kid and force them to do something, so stop blaming them. How would you like it if you were always blamed for ANYTHING any of your friends did, or your cat or dog?
 

johnjohn320

Diamond Member
Jan 9, 2001
7,572
2
76
GoldenTiger, are you forgetting that a kindergartener is 4, maybe 5 years old? He can't think for himself yet, his parents are supposed to make sure that he's not doing that sh!t, and learning that he shouldn't along the way.
 

GoldenTiger

Banned
Jan 14, 2001
2,594
0
0
LOL! You think anyone who is under XX age can't think? So supposedly a 3 year old can not manage to think that he/she wants to form a sentence asking for an ice cream or something? That they can't realize they like playing with a certain toy and decide they want to play with it again?

I had no idea people here were such sheep... and I suppose a kid can't put together the conclusion that his sister is annoying for teasing him and playing mean tricks all the time?
 

kduncan5

Golden Member
Apr 22, 2000
1,794
0
0
Used to be, a kid of kindergarten age would wear a cowboy outfit and play with plastic guns. Now some jerkoff leaves a real gun laying around, the kid thinks 'What a cool toy' (or some such), and BANG!BANG!

Only this gun is real.

Whoever left the gun laying around for the kid to pick up needs hung up by his scrotum (or corresponding female anatomical body part) and left there 'till he/she rots.:| -kd5-
 

GoldenTiger

Banned
Jan 14, 2001
2,594
0
0


<< GoldenTiger, are you forgetting that a kindergartener is 4, maybe 5 years old? He can't think for himself yet, his parents are supposed to make sure that he's not doing that sh!t, and learning that he shouldn't along the way. >>



Oh, and they're also supposed to follow him into school and watch him as he goes to the bathroom, too, huh? Go get yourself a brain, Mr. SheepLlamaMan!
 

GoldenTiger

Banned
Jan 14, 2001
2,594
0
0


<< Used to be, a kid of kindergarten age would wear a cowboy outfit and play with plastic guns. Now some jerkoff leaves a real gun laying around, the kid thinks 'What a cool toy' (or some such), and BANG!BANG!
>>



Yeah, it happens...
 

Yo Ma Ma

Lifer
Jan 21, 2000
11,635
2
0


<< The unloaded weapon was taken from the Maximo 7-year-old without incident. >>



<< In the principal's letter to parents, Hires said the kindergartener would not be returning to Maximo this summer.

Maximo's school year does not end until July 26. Its students attend classes for 210 days rather than the traditional 180 days.
>>

I'm really glad my kid isn't going to this brain-bombed palace. Not because a 7-yo kindergartener brought an unloaded handgun to school though.

They don't even know why the kid brought the gun, obviously he could not and did not do any harm with it. They are still &quot;investigating&quot; yet send a letter home letting everyone know the boy isn't coming back, good grief.
 

kamiam

Banned
Dec 12, 1999
2,638
0
0
more elitest spew and misdirection


<< We have got to do something about guns here in America folks >>


instead of pointing the finger where it belongs... just how the hell did those parents &quot;allow&quot; access of a weapon to a toddler???
and by the way if you let a 4-5 year old out in the streets unattended to either &quot;find&quot;
it or let someone &quot;give&quot; it to him/her, you should be locked up and have your children removed from your custody
 

67gt500

Banned
Jun 17, 2001
412
0
0
Sorry Classy hate to break it to you but guns were far more prevalant in american households 150 years ago and massacres like school shootings were unheard of.

Your attempt to blame a material object over values or lack there of in this country is a stretch even the most desperate liberals would call out of line.


Of course it is simple to blame the existence of guns. Someone gets into a car accident and a person or multiple persons die, without the cars that sort of thing wouldn't happen. We live in a society with freedoms.. and with freedoms we accept responsibilities.

You want the freedoms without the responsibilities.
 

RGN

Diamond Member
Feb 24, 2000
6,623
6
81


<< Well at least this time no one got shot. But this is just more of the same. We have got to do something about guns here in America folks.
Gun toting Kindegartener
>>




No jackass, we have to do something about the Parents here in America.
 

kamiam

Banned
Dec 12, 1999
2,638
0
0
67gt500


<< You want the freedoms without the responsibilities >>

...
sorry your wrong Classy really wants NO part of either...he'd rather tell someone what they can do, what they can think ect...
 

67gt500

Banned
Jun 17, 2001
412
0
0
your right I was off...

he doesn't want freedoms or responsibilities.

he wants to blame everything on material objects.

I stand corrected.
 

LordMaul

Lifer
Nov 16, 2000
15,168
1
0
Yep...the kid probably couldn't get the bullets...maybe because the parents were being careful...IE, keep the handgun at a place where they can get to it EASILY, but the bullets where it is up high or something...IE, someones comes in to your house, you pull a gun fast, and get bullets if you have time.(that's hoping you won't need to fire. :))
 

LordMaul

Lifer
Nov 16, 2000
15,168
1
0
(BTW classy, da HELL is going on with this?! I feel like an asshole because it is me and like 5 others against YOU. Like an unfair fight, know-what-I-mean? :))
 

kamiam

Banned
Dec 12, 1999
2,638
0
0


<< I feel like an asshole because it is me and like 5 others against YOU. Like an unfair fight, know-what-I-mean? >>


with brains like that Classy is his own worst enemy and needs no help from us in losing a fight like this...(or his &quot;up w/france&quot; stance either)
 

kamiam

Banned
Dec 12, 1999
2,638
0
0
notice how he spouts his spew and then runs and hides w/o trying to defend his opinion...of course its hard to defend the indefensable attitude of someone like this...typical,oh so typical:disgust:
 

GoldenBear

Banned
Mar 2, 2000
6,843
2
0


<< (BTW classy, da HELL is going on with this?! I feel like an asshole because it is me and like 5 others against YOU. Like an unfair fight, know-what-I-mean? :)) >>

And the five of you apparently have guns so it's like 2 million on one.

However I'll jump on his side, making it 2 million...on 2.
 

Amused

Elite Member
Apr 14, 2001
57,124
18,654
146
This is obviously not the gun's fault, or the child's fault. A 7 year old cannot be held responsible for their actions in the way an adult can.

This is ALL about the parents and/or gun owner. If the gun is thiers, they should be prosecuted for child endangerment, and negligence. If not, they should find out who's gun it is, and prosecute them.

Classy, no one wants freedom without respinsibility. The PARENTS and/or gun owner needs to be held responsible for allowing this to happen.

But how is punishing EVERYONE ELSE for these peoples negligence going to solve anything?
 

classy

Lifer
Oct 12, 1999
15,219
1
81
Good morning :). Now lets see. The problem is there are too many guns in America and they are far too easy to get. There is no need for handguns anyway except for law enforcement officials.

kamiam I don't appreciate your attitude or your pms. You obviously are a clown, who fits in with the &quot;crew&quot; I call them, who think they have it all figured out. This problem is beyond just educating parents. All the education in the world is not going to change a thing till we begin to remove the guns that
A. That do not serve any purpose outside of killing. In example all handguns.
B. Make it mandatory for licenses and more strict background checks to be done.
C. Require those who have guns to have to have a safe, not a lock.
D. Make a mandatory waiting period of no less than 6 months.

If we just did b,c, and d, and made them federal manadates for all states, we could at least slow down some of the possession of guns for illegal purposes. Being able to buy a weapon at a show is absolutely wrong and should be stopped immmediately.

RGN as usual my condolences to your lack of anything intelligent to say. You were right about one thing though, We do have do something about the parents. In the realm of child birth.

If you think nothing should be done, I hope my kids don't go to school with any of yours. In all the school incidents, almost 70% of the kids either got the gun from home or a relative.
 

Burn

Golden Member
Oct 9, 1999
1,104
0
0
Classy - We practically have b c and d in Canada and all it has done is make it difficult for the people who want to own their guns legally. The people who are killing, ie using the guns illegally get the guns through illegal channels. Get it?
 

classy

Lifer
Oct 12, 1999
15,219
1
81


<< Classy - We practically have b c and d in Canada and all it has done is make it difficult for the people who want to own their guns legally. The people who are killing, ie using the guns illegally get the guns through illegal channels. Get it? >>



Canada must be doing something right. They have a much much lower incidence of gun violence than here in the states.