Yep. Also SavageOriginally posted by: SithSolo1
Hey, are Marlin .22s any good? I want a bolt-action .22 in the sub $200 range.
Originally posted by: Shockwave
Originally posted by: Jimbo
I would rather be shot by an M-16 with a FMJ round that I would with a .22 long rifle w/a hollow point.
I dont think you know much about guns.
The FMJ would kill you much easier then the hollow point.
Check the muzzle energy.
Originally posted by: Spikesoldier
wow look at the responses,
well it's purpose is for shooting that pesky bird that always eats the fish in my pond.
i am using .22 winchester hollow point bullets.(i guess it does some damage)
dont worry guys i am 'sponsable with guns.
Originally posted by: Spikesoldier
?
Shockwave
Speaking of....Anyone know where I could find some Black Talons?
Originally posted by: Jimbo
The Mannlicher-Carcano is an absolute piece of garbage and I am surprised Oswald hit ANYTHING with it.
Its nick name with the Italian army was the "Humane Gun" because they never hurt anyone.
{edit}: An M-1 would have been a MUCH better choice.
Originally posted by: notfred
There is a HUGE difference between a .22 and a .223 Have you ever fired either one? A .223 has about 10 times more powder behind it than a .22 rimfire cartridge.
Originally posted by: yellowfiero
Originally posted by: Jimbo
The Mannlicher-Carcano is an absolute piece of garbage and I am surprised Oswald hit ANYTHING with it.
Its nick name with the Italian army was the "Humane Gun" because they never hurt anyone.
{edit}: An M-1 would have been a MUCH better choice.
He said M1 carbine, not M1 Garand, which is what you are referring to. Actually, the M1 carbine is an inaccurate short range weapon, so it would NOT be a better choice at all.
And just to clarify further, the itty bitty one is .22LR, or Long Rifle. I've seen people get confused by that in other threads.Originally posted by: notfred
Originally posted by: jemcam
Originally posted by: notfred
.22 (top) compared to .223 (bottom)
Thank you for clarifiying that.
Welcome.
Originally posted by: Jimbo
Originally posted by: yellowfiero
Originally posted by: Jimbo
The Mannlicher-Carcano is an absolute piece of garbage and I am surprised Oswald hit ANYTHING with it.
Its nick name with the Italian army was the "Humane Gun" because they never hurt anyone.
{edit}: An M-1 would have been a MUCH better choice.
He said M1 carbine, not M1 Garand, which is what you are referring to. Actually, the M1 carbine is an inaccurate short range weapon, so it would NOT be a better choice at all.
You are right that is what I meant. An M-1 carbine still could have easily made that shot. It has an effective range of 300 yards.
Originally posted by: Shockwave
Yes, the FMJ leaves a clean wound, but nonetheless has more ME, and also alot worse shock wave. The wound itself may be "clean" but the surrounding tissue is still all screwed up just from the force of the shockwave as the bullet passes. The .22 HP wont have enough omph to really do the damage a .223 would. Now, drop the hoolow point into a bigger caliber...Well, then it gets very very ugly.
Speaking of....Anyone know where I could find some Black Talons?
Originally posted by: Shockwave
Yes, the FMJ leaves a clean wound, but nonetheless has more ME, and also alot worse shock wave. The wound itself may be "clean" but the surrounding tissue is still all screwed up just from the force of the shockwave as the bullet passes. The .22 HP wont have enough omph to really do the damage a .223 would. Now, drop the hoolow point into a bigger caliber...Well, then it gets very very ugly.
Speaking of....Anyone know where I could find some Black Talons?
Originally posted by: Colt45
Damage?
yes it will kill a person if you hit them in the right spot.
but it's really designed for vermin, there is a reason why armies don't equip .22's.
Originally posted by: Jimbo
Originally posted by: AlienCraft
Only if you go with the Lone Gunman Theory.Originally posted by: Jimbo
Originally posted by: jemcam
Originally posted by: Kaieye
RFK was killed by a .22 bullet in the head...
No, he was "officially" shot by an M1 carbine, which is a .30 caliber.
(edit, my bad, I first read JFK, not RFK)
Neither was JFK.
JFK was shot with a 6.5mm bolt action Mannlicher-Carcano.
Read and learn
Bogus Buff Ballistics
Originally posted by: Triumph
Originally posted by: Jimbo
Originally posted by: AlienCraft
Only if you go with the Lone Gunman Theory.Originally posted by: Jimbo
Originally posted by: jemcam
Originally posted by: Kaieye
RFK was killed by a .22 bullet in the head...
No, he was "officially" shot by an M1 carbine, which is a .30 caliber.
(edit, my bad, I first read JFK, not RFK)
Neither was JFK.
JFK was shot with a 6.5mm bolt action Mannlicher-Carcano.
Read and learn
Bogus Buff Ballistics
Hmmm, odd. This page doesn't mention the fact that JFK WAS SHOT IN THE FACE. The Zapruto (sp?) film clearly shows a shot to the right forehead/temple area, resulting in a backwards and to the left motion of his body. Physics states that he was shot from the front, thereby negating the Lone Gunman theory (if you believe that Oswald also shot him, which I'm not arguing about here.)
Originally posted by: Jimbo
Varminter
Budget? We don't need no stinkin' BUDGET!
The Ultimate Varmint shooter.![]()
