Originally posted by: Queasy
Yep. Most movies equal maybe 100-150 pages of a book. The Hobbit is approximately 300 pages.
most arbitrary "factoid" evar
Originally posted by: Queasy
Yep. Most movies equal maybe 100-150 pages of a book. The Hobbit is approximately 300 pages.
Originally posted by: Anubis
it splits PERFECTLY when the eagles leave them at the edge of mirkwood when gandalf leaves
Originally posted by: TehMac
This is really retarded. Peter Jackson was the only guy who could do it. This sucks.
Originally posted by: sirjonk
Originally posted by: TehMac
This is really retarded. Peter Jackson was the only guy who could do it. This sucks.
what exactly did he do before lotr that showcased his ability to do lotr? he did a great job but theres a few dozen guys who could have made "the frighteners"
Originally posted by: TehMac
Originally posted by: sirjonk
Originally posted by: TehMac
This is really retarded. Peter Jackson was the only guy who could do it. This sucks.
what exactly did he do before lotr that showcased his ability to do lotr? he did a great job but theres a few dozen guys who could have made "the frighteners"
Well, it's obvious he could at least appreciate the LotR universe, he made three stellar movies. While I disagreed with some of the adaptation of the movie, he made himself brilliant. What has the new guy done to show similar appreciation?
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: TehMac
Originally posted by: sirjonk
Originally posted by: TehMac
This is really retarded. Peter Jackson was the only guy who could do it. This sucks.
what exactly did he do before lotr that showcased his ability to do lotr? he did a great job but theres a few dozen guys who could have made "the frighteners"
Well, it's obvious he could at least appreciate the LotR universe, he made three stellar movies. While I disagreed with some of the adaptation of the movie, he made himself brilliant. What has the new guy done to show similar appreciation?
what had jackson done prior to the movies?
Originally posted by: TehMac
Originally posted by: sirjonk
Originally posted by: TehMac
This is really retarded. Peter Jackson was the only guy who could do it. This sucks.
what exactly did he do before lotr that showcased his ability to do lotr? he did a great job but theres a few dozen guys who could have made "the frighteners"
Well, it's obvious he could at least appreciate the LotR universe, he made three stellar movies. While I disagreed with some of the adaptation of the movie, he made himself brilliant. What has the new guy done to show similar appreciation?
Originally posted by: jjones
One other item of interest regarding del Toro. I was just looking up his projects on IMDB and he's slated to do Lovecraft's At The Mountains Of Madness for 2010 release. That's another movie we can look forward to.![]()
Originally posted by: MaxDepth
Originally posted by: AmpedSilence
sequel to 'The hobbit' weren't they the lord of the rings movies?
Yeah, I thought that too. From the article:
As part of the deal, Del Toro will relocate to New Zealand for the next four years to work with Jackson and his production teams at Wingnut and WETA. He will direct the films back to back ? telling the story of "The Hobbit," and its sequel, which will deal with the 60-year period between "The Hobbit" and "The Fellowship of the Ring," the first book in the "Lord of the Rings" trilogy.
Did Tolkein ever write about that period? Or did his son? I think New Line is more drooling over perceived profits and new product tie-ins. I guess someone bet on the housing market, lost their shirt, and is looking to make it all back.
Originally posted by: jjones
Awesome. I like del Toro's movies and he's an excellent choice for director, and with Jackson at the helm the movie is sure to be consistent with LOTR. As for the sequel, not a bad idea. Of course they're milking it, but as long as they come up with a good story, I'm all for it. Maybe they can do something with Tom Bombadil in it.
Originally posted by: Xavier434
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: TehMac
Originally posted by: sirjonk
Originally posted by: TehMac
This is really retarded. Peter Jackson was the only guy who could do it. This sucks.
what exactly did he do before lotr that showcased his ability to do lotr? he did a great job but theres a few dozen guys who could have made "the frighteners"
Well, it's obvious he could at least appreciate the LotR universe, he made three stellar movies. While I disagreed with some of the adaptation of the movie, he made himself brilliant. What has the new guy done to show similar appreciation?
what had jackson done prior to the movies?
Lots of stuff
Peter Jackson IMDB
del Toro does excellent work. See Pan's Labyrinth, The Orphange and The Devil's Backbone. He's been writing and directing the fantasy/horror genre since he started and he always has good characters, good acting and good camera work in his movies. Besides, you do realize that Peter Jackson is executive producing the films, don't you? I'm sure the new movies won't be straying from the quality of work he's already done with LOTR.Originally posted by: TehMac
Originally posted by: sirjonk
Originally posted by: TehMac
This is really retarded. Peter Jackson was the only guy who could do it. This sucks.
what exactly did he do before lotr that showcased his ability to do lotr? he did a great job but theres a few dozen guys who could have made "the frighteners"
Well, it's obvious he could at least appreciate the LotR universe, he made three stellar movies. While I disagreed with some of the adaptation of the movie, he made himself brilliant. What has the new guy done to show similar appreciation?
