Large font makes the documentation more professional. It's supposed to be done that way. Whether the information is perfect or less than stellar, it has nothing to do with making large bold fonts. This makes it easier for viewers to read too.
My large font comment was related to your post in the " from xp win 7" thread where you tried to use my primary Linux user status to discredit my comments on other systems. Sorry for conflating the two threads, it's become difficult to remember which idiocy was posted in which.
The OP's use of large fonts for headings is fine, it's the content itself is questionable.
And at the same time we have bunch of people "blame" on malware infection which may have nothing to do with registry problem. You simply say "because of malware" that instantly makes the user ignorant too. It's not that simple as you think when it comes to registry and windows file system.
It actually is pretty simple when you understand how it works.
Problems with system failing due to Windows updates IS registry related. Everything is composed of registry in Windoz 🙂D) environment.
Sense, that sentence makes none. Windows updates are simply new versions of system files and possibly updating registry settings, but 99% of the payload is system files. That fact that you can't differentiate the two proves my point.
First, it's not 99% of the time. Problems caused by add-on's on IE is registry related. They are all handled by registry! And of course they often get registry corruptions too. So that 99% (with 1% being hardware problem) problem is with registry.
They are registered with IE in the registry, but the add-ons themselves aren't "handled by the registry". They're loaded by IE and run, that's it.
By your logic then all OS X problems are caused by HFS+ because everything in the system uses it. Correlation does not imply causation.
And that is no problem what-so-ever in Windows 2000/XP/2003. For security concern, it's a clear downgrade for Windows 7, or should I say "clear devastation".😱
When you change the name of the folder, it will not notify you with any alerts or popup box saying "Man, you are f#@ked if you change this folder name coz if you log back on all data will get wipped and you be f#@ked for good" or something similar in more appropriate way so you know what's coming ahead... :$
I haven't had time to try it in a VM yet, but I'll let you know my results when I can.
It's sometimes difficult to specify what is the culprit in the software because ALL IS MADE UP OF REGISTRY... You can start off with the error messages and error codes and do research. They are all registry problems. 🙂
Wow, it's people like you that give IT people a bad name. The registry is a database of settings, nothing more. Windows isn't "made up of the registry" or any other nonsense like that.
Actually, I have a great learning tip for you Nothingman. Think of registry as DNA of a human body. It tells where your nose and mouth should be located and how they function and behave. It's a complete set of instructions and database. Good advice. 😉
There are no words...
cheez said:
You don't get registry clogged with Mac OS X, like Windows does. Single point of failure in the registry in Windows affects the entire OS functions and / or performance. Mac OS X's file and cache system is brilliant. It's superior and the programmers who wrote these OSes are smarter.
Not according to some very smart people that aren't me or you.
http://www.engadget.com/2008/02/05/linus-torvalds-calls-apples-file-system-utter-crap/
Your blind allegiance is a little scary.
cheez said:
And please, Nothingman, stop thread crapping. This is OSXMan's quality thread that deserves sticky. Sometimes, thread crapping is worse than trolling. Please stop it.
No, one point of his was worth something and the other two are misinformation at best and intentionally misleading at worst.