Guide: Astrophotography with a DSLR

kami

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
17,627
5
81
I wrote this guide about one of my favorite hobbies. It's mostly catered to beginners but it explains step by step from taking pictures to processing them in Photoshop.

How To Guide: Astrophotography with a DSLR

I hope its helpful for those of you wanting to get into Astrophotography.
 

sixone

Lifer
May 3, 2004
25,030
5
61
Well done, thank you for sharing it.

My dad is very good at astrophotography. I'd like to get a tracker, but wow...they're expensive. :(
 

CuriousMike

Diamond Member
Feb 22, 2001
3,044
544
136
Nice... my few attempts in my backyard were thwarted by
a) raccoons - i'm scared of them
b) the focus issue.
That link to DarkSkyFinder could prove useful in the future.
 

arrfep

Platinum Member
Sep 7, 2006
2,314
16
81
Very nice, thanks! Had been thinking about starting an Astrophotography help thread literally just yesterday. On Sunday I went out for my first star shots, here's a couple of my faves:
img0391pw.jpg

img0380qs.jpg


Your guide makes me want to drive even farther and try to get some good star trails or the Milky Way.
 

SecurityTheatre

Senior member
Aug 14, 2011
672
0
0
Very nice, thanks! Had been thinking about starting an Astrophotography help thread literally just yesterday. On Sunday I went out for my first star shots, here's a couple of my faves:

Your guide makes me want to drive even farther and try to get some good star trails or the Milky Way.

I normally really dislike starfield photos with manmade objects in the foreground, but in this case, it really works, they're quite nice. :)

How long were those exposures? 15 seconds (guessing)?
 

arrfep

Platinum Member
Sep 7, 2006
2,314
16
81
I normally really dislike starfield photos with manmade objects in the foreground, but in this case, it really works, they're quite nice. :)

How long were those exposures? 15 seconds (guessing)?

Thanks. Didn't have much to work with in terms of landscape.

Horizontal one was 8 seconds, vertical was 5 seconds. Both at ISO 3200.
 

SonicIce

Diamond Member
Apr 12, 2004
4,771
0
76
thanks kami, great article
Thanks. Didn't have much to work with in terms of landscape.

Horizontal one was 8 seconds, vertical was 5 seconds. Both at ISO 3200.

thats a lot of stars for only 5 seconds, you must have a dark sky there.

i just built a barn door tracker (scotch mount). trying to come up with a good way to align it.
 
Last edited:

SecurityTheatre

Senior member
Aug 14, 2011
672
0
0
Thanks. Didn't have much to work with in terms of landscape.

Horizontal one was 8 seconds, vertical was 5 seconds. Both at ISO 3200.

Cool.

I suggest using as low an ISO as you can keep the stars stationary.

With a normal lens (<80mm) you should get away with 20 seconds, depending on the latitude and season, with a wide lens, you might even get 45 seconds or more.

Then you can shoot at ISO 200 and keep the noise down... not that it's an issue, but the noise is far easier to cope with at those lower settings and you get the same exposure otherwise.

Of course, with a longer lens (and near the equator), you need shorter exposures to keep the star trails away. I have seem them with a 200mm lens as short as 5 seconds.

But... sometimes you have a *very* dark sky and want to reach really deep into the heavens and the high ISO can help (but you should be maxing out your exposure length first, in my opinion)

I have three I would like to share, I hope that's alright.

First, this is the deepest I've ever been able to reach.

This is on a D700, at f/2.8 ISO 6400 for 30 seconds, almost 50 miles from the nearest man-made light, at about 10,000 feet elevation on a cold, dry fall night. This one is amazing. At a 100% crop, it's impossible to tell the amp noise from stars, every pixel has a unique value in an almost fractal sense and each zoom level reveals a whole new set of star patterns. It makes me wish for a large telescope or a tracker. :)

DF9A96DA02904E83B19B86AC0F153048.jpg


The next two were taken while flying over the North Atlantic in the late spring on a 747 between Canada and Norway. It took me 30 attempts for each each exposure (between 8 and 15 seconds) to get one that was sharp enough to keep. It was handheld and in a moving plane... tricky... But it kept me busy for a long flight.

Anyway, first, about 3am at 42,000 feet, facing south from just below the arctic circle.

F81F69CF1E2A43E7A8E8258AE55255B6.jpg


Second, the first hint of sunrise, also 42,000 feet, about 4am, facing north off the east coast of Iceland.

94AE8530214F4AC789E0DAA7767AFE0D.jpg



So, all of these ignore my "lower ISO is better" advice as they were all at ISO 6400, but I guess I posted them as exceptions, either when it's so dark you need more than 30 or 60 seconds can give you at ISO 200, or you need to avoid shaking (in an airplane?) :p




:)


Edit: Image links fixed

Edit2: I just read the whole guide, and I think I was a bit repetitive with a few points, but I guess it's good that we agree! He's certainly far more of an expert at the topic than I am!
 
Last edited:

microAmp

Diamond Member
Jul 5, 2000
5,988
110
106
Good read, I'll be bookmarking this. I'll have to make an effort to drive out of those light pollution zones one day, so much to learn. :)
 

jhansman

Platinum Member
Feb 5, 2004
2,768
29
91
Nice guide, but if I may suggest an edit, you might want to change the part about cable releases from "You can by cheap ripoffs on ebay instead of paying for a genuine one." to something "You can find inexpensive, third-party remotes and releases on Amazon or eBay." I have two such devices, both of which I got on Amazon, both third-party, and they work perfectly. Thanks for the very useful info.
 

kami

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
17,627
5
81
Nice guide, but if I may suggest an edit, you might want to change the part about cable releases from "You can by cheap ripoffs on ebay instead of paying for a genuine one." to something "You can find inexpensive, third-party remotes and releases on Amazon or eBay." I have two such devices, both of which I got on Amazon, both third-party, and they work perfectly. Thanks for the very useful info.

haha, good call. I didn't mean it harshly. I use one of the "cheap knockoffs" myself ;)


SecurityTheatre, your images don't seem to be loading for me.