I continually get a laugh out of the AMD "victim" mindset. Instead of asking AMD to deliver a product with better performance per watt, a metric that AMD objectively (for the lack of a better word) completely sucks at, they'll blame everything else. Conspiracies, bribes, compilers, the list goes on.. Let's just blame everyone except where the blame lies: AMD for delivering endless products with poor performance or poor performance per watt. Performance per watt is everything for mobile, and AMD either ends up delivering an under performing product or a product with terrible PPW.
Maybe that can change in the future, but in the meantime, perhaps some AMD fans can actually ask AMD to deliver on the metrics that matter for mobile. Apparently, intel has delivered competitive performance per watt in every computing segment. But we can't ask that of AMD. We just have to pretend their inferior performance per watt is not their fault.
And like intel stated, if beema / mullins are good products which reverse the trend of past products, then we will see products using them. Period. Bay Trail is being used in products because it's a good SOC with competetive performance per watt; is it perfect? Absolutely not. But it's a great product with good CPU performance and good performance per watt. If beema and mullins are good products, you will see them in devices. Period. So let's see if AMD can put their money where their mouth is this time. Will that happen or will it be a repeat of past products?