yeah, it definitely seems abundantly clear that he is in the executive branch. Article II sets out executive powers, and that is where you find the provisions for the VP's election, conditions for assuming the presidency, and procedure for impeachment. One would think that if the constitutional rules governing your election and possible removal are in article II, right alongside those of the President, that means you are subject to the limitations of the executive branch. That and pretty much every legal scholar on the planet agrees that he is in the executive branch.
Even if Cheney is somehow primarily part of the legislative branch, he's still full of shit. If he serves both legislative and executive functions, he should be subject to the limitations of whatever branch governs the activity in question, not neither branch. I'm pretty sure that an agency dealing with national security information has zero legislative character and is entirely executive in nature. He can't both claim to be in the legislative branch to avoid executive disclosure AND claim to be in the executive branch to avoid legislative disclosure (which he did in 2001). That's like claiming that a man with dual citizenship can't be convicted of murder in country A because he is a citizen of country B... and then that he can't be convicted in a murder in Country B because of citizenship in Country A.
This makes me want to beat him over the head with my constitutional law book... I could just tell him it was an accident and I thought he was a quail...
