http://forums.evga.com/Nvidia-only-supports-up-to-SLI-on-10-series-cards-m2477545-p3.aspx#2477871
99.9% of us don't care, but I do feel for those few who always bought 4 cards.
On the plus side, the performance of 2-way SLI will be better than before thanks to the new bridge.
It still matters for dual-GPU users:
1) Additional cost of SLI HB bridges not included in almost any current boards.
2) If you carry over new cards to a new mobo should you upgrade and the mobo has a different arrangement, you need a new bridge depending on the spacing of the new mobo you get.
3) Possible interference with certain AIB cards. Could this be a way for NV to push people even more into FE level cards that were designed to be a "perfect fit" for these new SLI HB?
4) Stuck at 2GB/sec vs. 16GB/sec for AMD. The minute PCIe 4.0 is introduced, AMD's available bandwidth grows to 32GB/sec.
5) 1070 is still limited to old 1GB/sec 1st gen SLI bridges. Why such an artificial limitation to further GIMP 1070 SLI? I mean if 1080 is only 25% faster than 1070, wouldn't it stand to reason that if 1080 SLI requires SLI HB bridge that 1070 SLI would also benefit from them? AMD's CF bridges already limited HD7970GF beyond 2560x1600 and they were 0.9GB/sec. This means 1070 SLI will never extract its full potential with 1st gen SLI.
I covered most of these points
here.
Honestly, NV is just making reasons to charge us more it feels like. First reference cards magically go up by $70-100 and now we need new SLI HB bridges when XDMA is
free.