- Dec 11, 2011
- 50
- 0
- 0
yeah sure, if you pay the difference 499-150=349 I ll buy one
)) Is funny cuz I asked something and everybody is saying go for 670/680 without thinking at my budget.
@borisvodofsky what`s a "ramen"? japanese food?
)) Is funny cuz I asked something and everybody is saying go for 670/680 without thinking at my budget.
@borisvodofsky what`s a "ramen"? japanese food?
I'm waiting for 660 Ti to see if it's worth replacing my 560 Ti with. If it's a 2GB card that is overclockable to GTX 670 speeds, I'm definitely going for it
The 660Ti will come when there are enough Keplers that failed 680 binning AND 670 binning. We just need to wait for those to pile up much like we did with the 670.
Does this mean that all of those chips have the same physical size / number of transistors, and that they're differentiated only by clockspeeds and by having some CUDA cores, ROPs etc. disabled compared to the higher binned versions?
The 660Ti will come when there are enough Keplers that failed 680 binning AND 670 binning. We just need to wait for those to pile up much like we did with the 670.
Unlikely. This isn't the way Nvidia have been doing it. The 460 was not a cut down 480/470 chip, nor was the 560 a cut down 580/570. I believe the 660/650 will be based on it's own chip, probably GK107.
EDIT: I really thought you were serious! Bah!