Gruesome pic on pics.bbzzdd.com

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

MartyMcFly3

Lifer
Jan 18, 2003
11,436
29
91
www.youtube.com
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: Rudee
Imagine how a .50 round would cause someone's head to explode on impact. Basically, it's a guy with very litte head left after taking a direct shot from a high caliber round to the head.

Cool. Forensics, physics, and biology absolutely fascinate me. I want to see the picture.

agreed.
 

MikeMike

Lifer
Feb 6, 2000
45,885
66
91
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: JonnyStarks
Originally posted by: Rudee
Imagine how a .50 round would cause someone's head to explode on impact. Basically, it's a guy with very litte head left after taking a direct shot from a high caliber round to the head.

I take it this is what did it to him?

:D

ive seen pics of a body after a SAW went through him about 10 times.

MIKE
 

RedRooster

Diamond Member
Sep 14, 2000
6,596
0
76
I thought using .50cal on infantry was against whatever the rules of war were?
Or am I way off?
I don't know nothing about war and don't really care to know the specifics.
 

NikPreviousAcct

No Lifer
Aug 15, 2000
52,763
1
0
Originally posted by: RedRooster
I thought using .50cal on infantry was against whatever the rules of war were?
Or am I way off?
I don't know nothing about war and don't really care to know the specifics.

You're way, WAY off.
 

Rogue

Banned
Jan 28, 2000
5,774
0
0
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: RedRooster
I thought using .50cal on infantry was against whatever the rules of war were?
Or am I way off?
I don't know nothing about war and don't really care to know the specifics.

You're way, WAY off.

He's exactly right. There are certain rules of engagement that must be adhered to, but in war they tend to "loosen up" a little bit. Hell, look back in history. The original muskets used in the early wars were massive caliber compared to today's rifles and far less "humane" than what we use today.

I've seen the picture in question. The guy's head looks like the remains of a water balloon that burst.
 

MegaWorks

Diamond Member
Jan 26, 2004
3,819
1
0
Originally posted by: maziwanka
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: SurgicalShark
Originally posted by: Nik
Why do threads like this even exist?

Shut up man....you should have looked at the picture....get yourself a life if you can not respect deceased person.

BTW it is removed.

Dude, they're FVCKING DEAD. :roll: "Respect for the dead" is a falacy. It should be respect for the family of the dead guy --in this case, it's the frickin internet, not standing in front of the family going "WOAH, COOL! BLOOD!"

I would have looked. Anyone got the picture? I want to see it, now.

i'm with nik on this one.

me too
 

Wallydraigle

Banned
Nov 27, 2000
10,754
1
0
Originally posted by: Rogue
Originally posted by: Nik
Originally posted by: RedRooster
I thought using .50cal on infantry was against whatever the rules of war were?
Or am I way off?
I don't know nothing about war and don't really care to know the specifics.

You're way, WAY off.

He's exactly right. There are certain rules of engagement that must be adhered to, but in war they tend to "loosen up" a little bit. Hell, look back in history. The original muskets used in the early wars were massive caliber compared to today's rifles and far less "humane" than what we use today.

I've seen the picture in question. The guy's head looks like the remains of a water balloon that burst.


Is it the one where he's lying on the street face up and what's left of his head is pointing towards the camera?
 
Feb 10, 2000
30,029
67
91
You'd think an old codger like Bozoned would know better than to post this, but I guess wisdom doesn't always come with age.
 

Ronstang

Lifer
Jul 8, 2000
12,493
18
81
Originally posted by: SurgicalShark
Shut up man....you should have looked at the picture....get yourself a life if you can not respect deceased person.

BTW it is removed.

If it is the picture I think it is from the descriptions here of a "sniper's headshot" then I have it in an e-mail......and respect? Respect for what? The guy was a fricken terrorist not a human being and the more of them that die a horrible death the better. I support the killing of everyone of those vermon that is possible. I personally enjoyed the picture. I have quite a few of those pictures on my HD, I got them from someone very close to me who is in danger EVERY DAY from those fvcktards over in Afghanistan and I have a gallery of the terrorists he has personally removed from the gene pool. Don't ask....because those will never be shown to anyone, especially on the internet.
 

waggy

No Lifer
Dec 14, 2000
68,143
10
81
What kinda amazes me is that there is not a LOT of pictures/movies of the war. I have seen a few that were posted on another website. Some were pretty grusome but not that bad.

 

Ozoned

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2004
5,578
0
0
Originally posted by: Modeps
removed, in the future I'm sure if you PM either me or Dwell it'll get taken care of with quickness... or we'll just notice it and get rid of it ourselves.

How are the little ones ;) supposed to learn about the horrors of war if you censor what they see?

A picture tells a story that a lifetime of words can never convey:gift: . I actually thought that a site that hosted pics exclusively would know that. Guess not. :disgust:
 

Ozoned

Diamond Member
Mar 22, 2004
5,578
0
0
Originally posted by: DonVito
You'd think an old codger like Bozoned would know better than to post this, but I guess wisdom doesn't always come with age.
Not good to see that your self imposed exile has done nothing for your assitude.:)

By the way Buddy, What is your education (Phd of something, wasn't it) and what are you currently doing for a living? (in the military, right) :laugh: And last, How old are you?:p