Greenspan: Let Bush's Tax Cuts Expire

Page 3 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.

MotF Bane

No Lifer
Dec 22, 2006
60,801
10
0
Hey now, don't insult the neighborhood Fast Food Preparation Engineer that way. Dave can only aspire to that position. :awe:

What's left under Fast Food Preparation Engineer? Grunting and pointing at the floor while holding a mop?
 

ebaycj

Diamond Member
Mar 9, 2002
5,418
0
0
lol I'll be glad to pay the extra 2% increase from 33% to 35% so those lowlife leech fucks get a 50% increase

I bet in absolute dollar amount, your 2% increase is equivalent to at least 10 people's 5% increase. Still feel good about it?
 

IndyColtsFan

Lifer
Sep 22, 2007
33,655
688
126
What's left under Fast Food Preparation Engineer? Grunting and pointing at the floor while holding a mop?

Maybe. But what we do know is that regardless of positions, Dave couldn't work at Long John Silver's because of the presence of Malt Vinegar.
 

ebaycj

Diamond Member
Mar 9, 2002
5,418
0
0
You think a working couple making $130K is rolling in cash? You really are a minimum wage loser, aren't you?

Dave has likely made less than 50k for his entire life, and has never been able to move past that milestone.

Others, do that either right out of college, or with 2-3 years experience.
 

ebaycj

Diamond Member
Mar 9, 2002
5,418
0
0
You can't possibly be this clueless. In a lot of places, 130K is next to nothing. Picture gets worse when you factor in their mortgage, possible car payments, student loan repayment, and the fact that of that 130K, 50K is likely going to Federal/State/Local income taxes.

It boggles my mind that so many people seem perfectly willing to let their taxes jump by such large margins. We're not talking about 5 dollars a month here, guys. Taxes should be kept as low as possible, keeping spending under that figure. This is a concept our elected political heroes have a hard time grasping.

I pull in just under 40K a year, and of that, more than half goes to the government in some fashion. Money I could have spent on furniture for my residence, computer parts, landscaping, etc. Money, by the way, that doesn't get cycled back into the economic engine and instead disappears into the government dead weight.

Your opinion no longer matters. It's obvious that you are a deluded wage slave and don't even know it. You are taking your oppressors side with your rhetoric. Sad.
 

JD50

Lifer
Sep 4, 2005
11,928
2,919
136
lol I'll be glad to pay the extra 2% increase from 33% to 35% so those lowlife leech fucks get a 50% increase

You fail at deductions if you're actually paying 33%. Those of us that are in the middle class and have kids and a house usually fall down within that 10% range after all the deductions are accounted for.
 

Slew Foot

Lifer
Sep 22, 2005
12,379
96
86
You fail at deductions if you're actually paying 33%. Those of us that are in the middle class and have kids and a house usually fall down within that 10% range after all the deductions are accounted for.

Once you start making real cash you lose a lot of deductions and get creamed by AMT. Unless you incorporate, high wage earning w-2 workers get shafted.
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Once you start making real cash you lose a lot of deductions and get creamed by AMT. Unless you incorporate, high wage earning w-2 workers get shafted.

There ya go. I bet "Pacific anesthesiology" bought you a Porsche to get to hospital to hospital.
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
You fail at deductions if you're actually paying 33%. Those of us that are in the middle class and have kids and a house usually fall down within that 10% range after all the deductions are accounted for.

What he really fails at is he still pays increaes in every graduation so formerly 10% at low end is 15% as well for those bracketed dollars for him. Depending how much he makes the so-called 2% increase is actually higher when amortized over schedule. (well plus AMT)
 

BoberFett

Lifer
Oct 9, 1999
37,562
9
81
Too bad you didn't get your "Civics for dummies" pamphlet instead, maybe then you'd know about things like seperation of powers....

I always thought Democrats were supposed to have better senses of humor. Oh well, guess they lie about that too.
 

Zebo

Elite Member
Jul 29, 2001
39,398
19
81
Maybe. But what we do know is that regardless of positions, Dave couldn't work at Long John Silver's because of the presence of Malt Vinegar.

LOL Oh MG the vinegar back ground checks. *That* was funny.
 

shira

Diamond Member
Jan 12, 2005
9,500
6
81
Watch what happens if congress doesn't extend it. I'm hoarding my money and not spending jack squat because of it. Also pulling my money out of the market this year specifically because of the increases.

There you go again, blaming the economy on tax policy. Seems to me that some right-wing wacko wrote in another thread the other day that all it requires to succeed is the right attitude, and that blaming others was a sure sign of failure. Yet here you are - yet again - blaming government for the economy and telling us you're going into an economic shell and hiding.

Why don't you explain to us how THAT attitude and behavior is the key to riches?
 

shira

Diamond Member
Jan 12, 2005
9,500
6
81
My wife and I were doing the math the other night and if tax rates went back to 2000 rates we would be looking at $500 less per month once she finishes school and is working full time.

Ouch.

Our income would be ~$130,000 combined. Not rolling in cash by any means. The $500 is even after 15% of both our incomes going into 401k and health insurance for the whole family.

Under the DEMOCRATIC proposal, your tax rates wouldn't change. The right-wing noise machine conveniently avoids mentioning that the proposal to let the Bush tax cuts lapse applies only to the upper brackets.
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
There you go again, blaming the economy on tax policy. Seems to me that some right-wing wacko wrote in another thread the other day that all it requires to succeed is the right attitude, and that blaming others was a sure sign of failure. Yet here you are - yet again - blaming government for the economy and telling us you're going into an economic shell and hiding.

Why don't you explain to us how THAT attitude and behavior is the key to riches?

Avoiding excessive taxation and taking advantage of current low rates when they are set to increase significantly (15% to 35%) is called being smart. Part of wealth building is also to examine tax implications of your decisions. Don't be obtuse and conflate the issue.
 

child of wonder

Diamond Member
Aug 31, 2006
8,307
176
106
Under the DEMOCRATIC proposal, your tax rates wouldn't change. The right-wing noise machine conveniently avoids mentioning that the proposal to let the Bush tax cuts lapse applies only to the upper brackets.

Good to know. Thank you for pointing that out.

I was under the impression that all tax brackets could go back to 2000 levels. Shame on me for not doing my research.
 

spidey07

No Lifer
Aug 4, 2000
65,469
5
76
Good to know. Thank you for pointing that out.

I was under the impression that all tax brackets could go back to 2000 levels. Shame on me for not doing my research.

You are correct. ALL brackets are set to rise with the biggest increases being the poor and middle class.
 

SammyJr

Golden Member
Feb 27, 2008
1,708
0
0
You think a working couple making $130K is rolling in cash? You really are a minimum wage loser, aren't you?

Outside of a major city, $130k is a very good income. Median household income in my county is right around $50k with most homes between $130k and $400k. Income at that level enables such a couple to save quite a bit.
 

CADsortaGUY

Lifer
Oct 19, 2001
25,162
1
76
www.ShawCAD.com
How are Republicans planning to offset extending Bush tax cuts to make them deficit neutral?

We've been over this before. There is no "cost" to a tax-cut. An extension would not need to be "offset" as it'd continue an already existing revenue stream.

IMO the question that should be asked is how the leftists plan on reducing the deficit after the tax-increase further damages our economy and thus tax revenue.
 

child of wonder

Diamond Member
Aug 31, 2006
8,307
176
106
You are correct. ALL brackets are set to rise with the biggest increases being the poor and middle class.

My Google-fu reveals most in Congress want the income brackets to stay the same with the exception of the 33% and 35% ones. Those would go to 36% and 39.6%.

http://www.savingtoinvest.com/2010/04/2010-and-2011-tax-brackets-new.html
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/07/12/republicans-sound-warning-expiration-bush-tax-cuts/
http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,2005389,00.html

It seems some are saying ALL of the tax cuts will expire while most seem to be saying that the middle class cuts will likely be extended.

However, the child tax credit may be cut in half. That would be a big blow to many families as would the marriage penalty.

Time will tell.