Great fem, good him (fem is better)

[WildHorse]

``

 

[BoomerD]

meh...facebook log-in required.

 

[MagnusTheBrewer]

OP, what is this "FaceBook" you speak of?

 

[WildHorse]

``

 

[WildHorse]

``

 

[AnonymouseUser]

BoomerD and MagnusTheBrewer,

I salute both of you "men of real genius"...

you rugged individualists...

as the very last holdouts standing alone on earth against the overwhelming tide of facebook.

You drive-by posters who added NADA show yourselves to be, indeed, "men of real genius."

hooyaaa it's just an amusing video at the op link, artistically novel enough that I thought others might enjoy it, since it's outside the run of the mill daily stuff. That's all. No big deal, just intended for fun + interesting for its originality. Atr least, thae video seems really original to humble me, with the chichk & her guy in tow creating something I find highly creative out of virtually nothing. No flashing colored lights, no lasers, no sound overdubs, just 2 humans being CREARTIVE.

Criticize to your content, I love it.

So next time you & your hottie date hit some expensive restaurant please do at your table what the chick in blue + her guy in tow do in this video ha ha ha

Uh, it's "Real Men of Genius", genius.

 

[MagnusTheBrewer]

I like the part where you post and immediately sign out. Do it again!

 

[AnonymouseUser]

Here is the video on Youtube for those of us without Facebook accounts (like me) and those who hate to log into our SO's account to watch it (like me).

 

[WildHorse]

``

 

[WildHorse]

``

 

[MagnusTheBrewer]

So, apparently the Japanese don't have a lock on wtf videos. Brool story Co!

 

[WildHorse]

~~

 

[BigFatCow]

AnonymouseUser,

Before posting here on Anandtech I looked really hard all over youtube but didn't find it.

Whatever that thing is in your link is NOT the video in the OP.
At your link I see a weirdo in a plastic facemask and some abberant quasi-lord-of-the-dance stuff.

If you do find it someplace other than facebook, which is a mountain too tough for those menof real genius like BoomerD and MagnusTheDrunk, please do post it.

The link you posted above is NOT it.







Yes, as for your correction of my misspelling you're right.
I gave away my laptop and just got a new one, which is my 1st time on Windows 7. (Sager Sager NP8690 based on Clevo W860CU)
I'm having some learning curve trouble getting used to Win7 & this new keyboard, making mistakes. My bad, you are right!)

They look like the same video to me.

 

[AnonymouseUser]

They look like the same video to me.

Yeah, the first link I posted wasn't it, it was just to their channel (as linked to from their website). Once I found the exact video I did edit the post with the correct link.

 

[WildHorse]

##

 

[BoomerD]

That's it? How wonderfully boring their lives must be if they spent all that time practicing and rehearsing such mundane things.

 

[WildHorse]

``

 

[DangerAardvark]

Yes, that "it." Creative as all get-out. WONDERFULLY creative.

They MADE something out of NOTHING!!!

Yaaaaayyyyyyyy.

Why does BoomerD feel the motivation to be the sour blue-nosed observer-critic tearing something down? That makes it seem like something's seriously, greviously wrong inside you!

Hey man, just relax and enjoy & appreciate & R E S P E C T somebody else's creativity!

Why on earth do you persist in "attacking???"

If you can't stand some other peoples' creative video, or you find it offensive, or you're unable to abide it, then PLEASE go back to your masturbatory (self-pleasuring) behavior, like photographing you image in your bathroom mirror.

Why the hell are you attacking 2 young people who put up an art-video on the web for wide enjoyment of all? Why on earth is this so profoundly annoying to "BoomerD" that you keep on attacking it and tearing it down??? What the hell's wrong in your psychology that you "need" to tear down someone else's art????

That's rhetorical, please don't bore us with your droning reply. PLEASE!!!!

Yuck. If there's anything worse than a hater, it's a whiner.

 

[destrekor]

I have no idea what the hell I just watched.

It wasn't even worth watching, in the "WTF was that?" sort of way.

 

[WildHorse]

``

 

[WildHorse]

$$

 

[DangerAardvark]

So you're saying if it doesn't come to you over BoomerD's approval, it must be meaningless nonsensical worthless, waste of time.

Absolutely incredible that nobody on ATOT likes any artistic stuff that is not aligned with preconceptions. As an undergrad I used to absolutely LOVE attending art presentations, music events, philosophy talks, etc. that challenged & thereby strengthened my thinking.

I can't fathom such apparent lack of intellectual curiosity by you BoomerD.

WTF is wrong that when an utterly nonoffensive to ANYBODY artistic expression draws mindless put-downs?

Does BoomerD speak for ATOT? Why the hell does BoomerD need too raise objection to an artwork outside the box?

In my life, that and sex are the ONLY things interesting, I have super-smart subordinates who deftly handle the "usual" "normal" "expected" stuff. Same as anybody who can afford it, I prefer to work mostly at the frontier, BEYOND the "usual," into mostly new advanced thing nobody's heard about yet, but will 10 years out. I appreciate creativity as represented in the OP video. Why does BoomerD continue tearing it down? WTF is wrong with you boy? Go back to shooting photos of yerself in yer bathroom mirror boy (mastrubation).

BoomerD, no reasonable person would understand whythe hell you keep on objecting to the OP video. Weird weird weird, like some Texan or Floridan or New York dweller, all of whom, like so many millions of your kin, sooner or later will be sitting here in California demanding state welfare benefit. All our truly weird ones come from out of state like yer d duchovny from NY Californication, that isn't us by a million miles.

Enjoy the artistic video or GO AWAY FOOL.

If one examines realism, one is faced with a choice: either reject cultural theory or conclude that narrativity is used to reinforce sexism, but only if the premise of predialectic semantic theory is valid; if that is not the case, society has intrinsic meaning. Therefore, in The Crying of Lot 49, Pynchon denies subdialectic cultural theory; in Gravity’s Rainbow, however, he examines realism.

Lyotard suggests the use of predialectic semantic theory to challenge class divisions. In a sense, Porter implies that we have to choose between realism and prepatriarchialist libertarianism.

If predialectic semantic theory holds, the works of Pynchon are reminiscent of Spelling. Therefore, the characteristic theme of Buxton’s model of realism is not deappropriation, as cultural theory suggests, but postdeappropriation.

 

[WildHorse]

``

 

[WildHorse]

``

 

[DangerAardvark]

Either you made your post based upon
http://emptybottle.org/bullshit/
or else you need strong meds stat!

hahahahaha

http://www.elsewhere.org/pomo/ actually. But I think you'll find anything generated from either site substantially indistinguishable from most of your posts. And quite a bit more lucid.