blurredvision
Lifer
GT2 didn't have more cars! When they listed the amount of cars for GT2, it equaled to around 400 cars, right? Well, this INCLUDED all the used cars as well. So the total car list, not including used listings, equaled at best a few over the count in GT3. They took out all the stupid cars that nobody even raced with or cared about.Originally posted by: boyRacer
I like GT2 better... the graphics on GT3 look awesome but GT2 just had more cars... and you could actually put some sort of kit on your car. 😀
The result is a overall better rounded game in GT3, better graphics or not.
GT3 has a better selection of cars overall, the tracks are designed elegantly, and the car customization is equal to that of GT2.
Someone mentioned not being able to put 'kits' on your car in GT3 like in GT2. This is negligable in the grand scheme of things, as the only thing the kits did in GT2 over what you can do in GT3 is put minimal body modifications on your car (i.e. ground effects and spoilers). The amount of customizations is great.
So to sum up, YES IT IS WORTH IT to plunk down $200 for a PS2 and get this game.